مبانیِ مشروعیّت خاتون‌های مغول و نقش آن در عملکردهای آنها

در تمام ادوار تاریخی، حکومتگران برای دستیابی به حکومت، نیازمند کسب مشروعیّت بوده اند. در واقع کسب مشروعیت، یکی از عوامل دوام و بقای سیاسی و استمرار سلطه‌ سلطه گران به حساب می آمده است. در دوره‌ مغولان نیز کسب مشروعیّت برای فرمانروایان آن، اهمیّت بسیاری داشت. در کنار خان های مغول، خاتون های دربار نیز عنصری بسیار تاثیرگذار به حساب می آمدند. نکته‌ قابل توجه در قبایل کوچ رو به ویژه مغولان صحراگرد، نوع معیشت و زیست آنها بوده که تعیین کننده اقتدار نیز بوده است. در دوران قبیله گی یا پیشاامپراطوری مغولان، زنان یا مادران، جایگاه و اهمیت ویژه ای در نهاد خانواده و ساختار قبیله داشتند و گردانندۀ اصلی اقتصاد خانواده به حساب می آمدند. آنها در دوران پس از شکل گیری امپراطوری توسط مغولان با عنوان خاتون های دربار، جایگاهی رفیع تر از گذشته در حکومت کسب کردند و بالتَّبع برای اعمال نفوذ و اقتدار بیشتر، اقدامات مثبت و منفی بسیاری را انجام می دادند. مسئله‌ محوری و یا به عبارتی دغدغه‌ اصلی پژوهش حاضر، یافتن منشا قدرت و مبانی مشروعیّت خاتون ها بوده است. به بیان دیگر این تحقیق در پی پاسخگویی به پرسش هایی از این قبیل است که سرچشمه و آبشخور قدرت خاتون های دربار مغولان، از کجا بوده است؟ آیا ارتباط عینی و عملی بین مبانی قدرت با اعمال سیاست (تصمیم سازی، تصمیم گیری و عملکردها) آنها وجود داشته است؟ در صورت مثبت بودن جواب، چگونه از مبانی در پیشبرد اهداف و اعمال سیاست و قدرت بهره گرفته می شد؟ یافته های پژوهش نشان می دهد که علاوه بر مسائل فرعی، حداقل سه منشا اصلی مشروعیت زا برای اعمال قدرت توسط خاتون ها وجود داشته است که عبارتند از: جایگاه و اهمیّت قدسی زن در سنّت های مغولی، اصل و نسب و پایگاه قبیله ای و جایگاه همسری یا مادری. در این مقاله سعی شده است تا با استفاده از روش تحلیلِ تاریخی با رویکرد توصیفی تحلیلی و با اتکا به منابع اصلی، موضوع مورد نظر بررسی و واکاوی شود.

the foundations of legitimacy of mongol khātūns and their role in their actions

the acquisition of legitimacy has always been an important matter for the establishment and continuity of a government, and the mongol empire was no exception to this rule. among the mongol khans, the sanctity of genghis khan's ancestors, his divine legitimacy, and his affiliation with the chinggisid family were considered foundational elements of legitimacy. in the mongol political system, in addition to the khans, the khātūns also held extraordinary power. during the tribal period or pre empire era of the mongols, women held a special significance. after the establishment of the empire, they, as the khātūns of the court, attained a higher status than before. in fact, khātūns played an active and influential role in many of the decisions of the government in political, military, social, religious, and other areas, and they easily exercised power in any field. it must be said that behind this influence and authority of the khātūns, there were certainly important and powerful foundations that enabled them to wield power and exert influence across various domains. literature reviewin some studies and articles, general information about the mongol khātūns and their exercise of power can be found. these include: the book women in iran during the mongol era by shirin bayani (2018), and articles such as the political, social, and cultural status of women during the mongol and ilkhanid periods by elham malekzadeh (2006), or the article examining and studying the status of women and khātūns in the mongol era based on historical evidence and archaeological data by yadollah heydari et al. (2012), as well as the article the administrative and political role of mongol khātūns by ahmad faroughbakhsh (2010), the article evaluating the legitimacy of the mongol tribes by morteza nouri (1993), and the article power and legitimacy during the ilkhanid period by hassan ansari qomi (1999). furthermore, the book mongol women in iran: khātūns by bruno di nicola (2017), the thesis women among the mongols by somayeh melik onjel (2019), the article women in the mongol empire by mark cartwright (2019), and the article women in mongol society by per jange ostermun (2000) are relevant. this study aims to discuss the sources of legitimacy and power of the khātūns, as well as their actions and decisions. methodologythe considerable power and authority of the mongol khātūns led the authors of this study to conduct a thorough and in depth investigation into the origin and source of such power, as well as to discuss the nature and details of their actions and the factors related to them. the goal of this research is to identify and examine the origins and foundations of the mongol khātūns' power. the study aims to provide substantiated and reasoned answers to the following questions: what were the foundations of legitimacy and the exercise of power by the mongol khātūns? how did they use these foundations in the advancement of their goals? the research methodology is descriptive analytical in terms of execution and fundamental in terms of purpose. the study utilized documentary (library) data collection methods, with the tool being note taking. findingsthe findings of the research indicate that, in addition to secondary issues, there are at least three main sources of legitimacy for the exercise of power by the khātūns. these are: the sacred status of women in mongol traditions, lineage and tribal base, and the role of motherhood or marriage. according to the sources, women held a special place and significance among the mongols, and one of the reasons for this is the story of the mongols' ancestor, alankua. she became pregnant by the will of god without a husband and gained a celestial and virtuous sanctity. in some historical texts, alankua is considered to have the same sacred status as the virgin mary. therefore, powerful khātūns also regarded this issue as an important basis for obtaining and maintaining their position. the preservation of lineage and having a clear family tree held particular importance among the mongol tribes. this important concept was also a strong foundation for the powerful khātūns. any khātūn who came from a famous and important tribe had a solid backing for exercising power. the role of motherhood or marriage was also an important basis, and khātūns who played the role of mothers were highly influential and significant. conclusionthe results of the paper show that khātūns were one of the key and influential elements in the mongol political system, and through their decisions and actions, they brought about fundamental changes in the mongol government system. they were able to make generals, nobles, princes, and even khans subordinate to them by exercising power, and with the influence they gained, they could even change the succession process in favor of themselves and their family. although the mongol khans were very powerful, sometimes the khātūns were the true rulers of the state and engaged in political activities behind the scenes. the influence that the khātūns had over the khans and their entourages is evident in the significant actions that took place. dismissing and appointing ministers, transferring power from one family to another, ordering the execution or exile of enemies, and appointing relatives and co religionists to important governmental positions were some of the actions of the khātūns, backed by the foundations of their power and legitimacy. the status and position of women in mongol beliefs and traditions reflected the power of the khātūns in political matters, and this position and value had a significant impact on the political, social, and religious dynamics of mongol society. furthermore, with the establishment of the ilkhanid government in iran, the status and importance of mongol khātūns continued and even influenced the position of women who were not of mongol origin, leading to the governance of powerful women in areas under mongol domination. keywords: sacred tradition of women, legitimacy, power, mongols, khātūns. referencesaghabakhshi, ali, and mino afshari rad (2013) dictionary of political science, 6th edition. tehran: čāpār.ajorlou, esmail, and daniyal taheri (2015) getting to know the concepts of public law: examining the concept of political power, scientific supervisor ali bahadori jahromi. tehran: pazhūhe scaron;kadeh ye scaron;ūrā ye negahbān. [in persian]alem, abdurrahman (1998) foundations of political science. tehran: ney. [in persian] lsquo;amīd, ḥassan (2010) farhang e fārsī. azizullah alizadeh, tehran: rāh e ro scaron;d. [in persian]ayati, abdolmohammad (1993) taḥrīr e tārīḵ e vaṣṣāf, 2nd edition. tehran: cultural studies and research. [in persian]banākatī, dāvood b. mohammad (1348) tārīḵ e banākatī, edited by jafar shoar. tehran: national art association. [in persian]barkhausen, joachim (1967) l'empire jaune de genghis khan, translated by ardeshir nikpour. tehran: dāvar panāh.bayani, shirin (2010) religion and government in iran during the mongol era, volume 1, 4th edition. tehran: academic publishing center. [in persian]bayani, shirin (2017) women in iran during the mongol era, 4th edition. tehran: university of tehran. [in persian]bayani, shirin (2021) religion and government in iran during the mongol era, volume 2, 4th edition. tehran: academic publishing center. [in persian]carpini, giovanni de piano (1984) histoire des mongols, que nous appelons tartares, translated by waliullah shadan. tehran: yesāvūlī. [in persian]chao pi shi yuan (2003) histoire secr egrave;te des mongols, translated by shirin bayani, 4th edition. tehran: university of tehran. [in persian]ejtehadi, mostafa (2012) encyclopaedia of iranian women, volume 1. tehran: persian encyclopaedia foundation of the ministry of science, research, and technology. [in persian]emami khoei, mohammad taqi (2021) turks, mongols, and the spread of iranian culture. tehran: negārestān e andī scaron;eh. [in persian]eqbal ashtiani, abbas (1986) mongol history from genghis's attack to the formation of the timurid government, 6th edition. tehran: amīr kabīr. [in persian]ḵāndmīr, ḡīyāṯ ul dīn b. hamām ul dīn (2001) tārīḵ e ḥabīb ul sīyar fī aḵbār afrād al ba scaron;ar, volume 3, with an introduction by jalal al din homaei, 4th edition. tehran: ḵayyām. [in persian]grousset, ren eacute; (2000) l'empire des steppes: attilas, gengis khan, tamerlan, translated by abdul hossein mikdeh, 4th edition. tehran: scientific and cultural. [in persian]hall, mary (2001) the mongol empire, translated by nader mirhosseini. tehran: qoqnūs.lane, george (2021) daily life in the mongol empire, translated by saeed duroudi. tehran: āgāh. [in persian]machiavelli, niccolo (2004) the prince, translated by mahmoud mahmoud, 2nd edition. tehran: ʿaṭṭār. [in persian]mo lsquo;īn, moḥammad (2006) farhang e mo lsquo;īn. tehran: ādenā. [in persian]morgan, david (2001) the mongols, translated by abbas mokhbar, 2nd edition. tehran: center. [in persian]mostūfī, ḥamdollāh (1983) tārīḵ e gozīdeh, by abdul hossein navaei, 2nd edition. tehran: amīr kabīr. [in persian]naḵǰavānī, moḥammad b. hendū scaron;āh (1964) dastūr ul kātīb fī taʿīīn al marātīb, vol. 2, edited by abdul karim ali oghli alizadeh. moscow. [in persian]plato (1989) republic, translated by fu'ad rouhani. tehran: scientific and cultural.rush, michael (1998) politics and society: an introduction to political sociology, translated by manouchehr sabouri. tehran: samt. [in persian]russell, bertrand (1988) power, translated by najaf daryabandari. tehran: ḵārazmī. [in persian] scaron;abānkāreʾī, moḥammad b. ʿalī b. moḥammad (1984) maǰmaʿ ul ansāb, edited by mirhashem mohhaddeth. tehran: amīr kabīr. [in persian]ucok, bahriye (1995) islamic devletlerinde kadin hukumdarlar, translated by mohammad taghi emami. tehran: kūroū scaron;. [in persian]vāleh eṣfahānī qazvīnī, moḥammad yūsuf (1379/2000) ḵold e barīn: tārīḵ e teīmūrīyān va turkamānān, vols. 6 and 7, edited by mirhashem mohhaddes. tehran: mīrāṯ e maktūb. [in persian]vincent, andrew (2004) theories of the state, translated by hossein bashiriyeh, 4th edition. tehran: ney.vladimirtsov, boris iakovlevich (2006) le r eacute;gime social des mongols: le f eacute;odalisme nomade, translated by shirin bayani, 4th edition. tehran: scientific and cultural. [in persian]vladimirtsov, boris iakovlevich (2015) genghis khan, translated by shirin bayani, 4th edition. tehran: asāṭīr. [in persian]watt, jones (1991) masters of political thought, translated by ali ramin, 3rd edition. tehran: amīr kabīr. [in persian]weber, max (1989) basic concepts of sociology, translated by ahmad sadraei. tehran: dāne scaron;gāhī. [in persian]weber, max (1995) economy and society, translated by abbas manouchehri and others. tehran: mūlā.