تحلیل نقش شبکه های اجتماعی مجازی در مذاکرات هسته ای وین

ﻫﺪف از ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ، ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻞ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺷﺒﮑﻪﻫﺎی اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ در ﻣﺬاﮐﺮات وﯾﻦ اﺳﺖ. روش ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﮔﯿﺮی ﻧﯿﺰ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﮔﯿﺮی ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪ و اﻧﺘﺨﺎب اﻓﺮاد ﻣﺘﺨﺼﺺ و ﻓﻌﺎل در ﺣﻮزه ﻣﺬﮐﻮر اﺳﺖ. ﺳﺆ ال اﺻﻠﯽ ﮐﻪ در اﯾﻨﺠﺎ ﻣﻄﺮح ﻣﯽﺷﻮد اﯾﻦ اﺳﺖ ﮐﻪ: ﻧﻘﺶ ﺷﺒﮑﻪﻫﺎی اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ در ﻣﺬاﮐﺮات ﻫﺴﺘﻪای وﯾﻦ ﭼﻪ ﺑﻮده اﺳﺖ؟ در اﯾﻦ راﺳﺘﺎ ﺳﺆاﻻت ﻓﺮﻋﯽ دﯾﮕﺮی ﻧﯿﺰ ﻣﻄﺮح ﻣﯽﺷﻮد: ﻧﻘﺎط ﺿﻌﻒ و ﻗﻮت ﮔﺮوه ﻣﺬاﮐﺮه ﮐﻨﻨﺪه ﻫﺴﺘﻪا ی در اﺳﺘﻔﺎده از ﺷﺒﮑﻪﻫﺎی اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ، اﻫﺪاف ﮔﺮوه ﻣﺬاﮐﺮاﺗﯽ در اﺳﺘﻔﺎده از ﺷﺒﮑ ﻪﻫﺎی اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ و ﮐﺎرﮐﺮد ﺷﺒﮑﻪﻫﺎی اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ در ﻣﺬاﮐﺮات ﻫﺴﺘﻪای وﯾﻦ ﭼﻪ ﺑﻮده اﺳﺖ؟ ﺑﺮای ﮔﺮدآوری داده ﻫﺎ از ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪﻫﺎی ﻧﯿﻤﻪﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎرﯾﺎﻓﺘﻪ اﺳﺘﻔﺎده ﺷﺪه و ﺗﻤﺎم داده ﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻬﺮه ﻣﻨﺪی از روش ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻞ ﻣﺤﺘﻮای ﮐﯿﻔﯽ ﻣﻮرد ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ ﻗﺮارﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ اﺳﺖ. ﻧﺘﺎﯾﺠﯽ ﮐﻪ در ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺆال اﺻﻠﯽ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ شد ﻧﺸﺎن داد ﮐﻪ ﺷﺒﮑﻪﻫﺎی اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ در روﻧﺪ ﻣﺬاﮐﺮات وﯾﻦ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺗﻌﯿﯿﻦﮐﻨﻨﺪه ای داﺷﺘﻪ اﺳﺖ. در ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺮﺳﺶ ﻓﺮﻋﯽ ﻧﺨﺴﺖ روﺷﻦ ﺷﺪ ﮐﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮدم، ﻣﺪﯾﺮﯾﺖ اﻓﮑﺎر ﻋﻤﻮﻣﯽ و اﺳﺘﻔﺎده از زﺑﺎن اﻧﮕﻠﯿﺴﯽ ﺑﺨﺸﯽ از ﻧﻘﺎط ﻗﻮت ﮔﺮوه ﻣﺬاﮐﺮه ﮐﻨﻨﺪه ﻫﺴﺘﻪای اﯾﺮان در اﺳﺘﻔﺎده از ﺷﺒﮑﻪﻫﺎی اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ ﺑﻮده اﺳﺖ و از ﺳﻮی دﯾﮕﺮ، ﻧﺪاﺷﺘﻦ راﻫﺒﺮد، ﺑﯽﻧﻈﻢ ﺑﻮدن و ﻧﺪاﺷﺘﻦ ﻣﺸﺎور رﺳﺎﻧﻪای را ﻧﯿﺰ ﻣﯽﺗﻮان در ﻟﯿﺴﺖ ﻧﻘﺎط ﺿﻌﻒ ﻣﺬاﮐﺮه ﮐﻨﻨﺪﮔﺎن در اﺳﺘﻔﺎده از اﯾﻦ ﺷﺒﮑﻪﻫﺎ ﺟﺎی داد. در ﺑﺨﺶ دﯾﮕﺮی از ﻧﺘﺎﯾﺞ و در ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺮﺳﺶ ﻓﺮﻋﯽ دوم ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺷﺪ ﮐﻪ ﺷﮑﺴﺘﻦ اﻧﺤﺼﺎر رﺳﺎﻧﻪای ﺟﺮﯾﺎن اﺻﻠﯽ، ﺑﺎﻻ ﺑﺮدن ﺳﺮﻣﺎﯾﻪ اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ ﻣﺮدم ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻن و ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﯿﻢ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮدم ﺟﻬﺎن و ﺳﺨﻦ رودررو ﺑﺎ اﻓﮑﺎر ﻋﻤﻮﻣﯽ از ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﯾﻦ اﻫﺪاﻓﯽ اﺳﺖ ﮐﻪ ﮔﺮوه ﻣﺬاﮐﺮه ﮐﻨﻨﺪه ﻫﺴﺘﻪای ﺑﺎ اﺳﺘﻔﺎده از ﺷﺒﮑﻪﻫﺎی اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ در ﭘﯽ آن ﺑﻮده اﻧﺪ و اﻣﺎ از دﯾﺪ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪﺷﻮﻧﺪﮔﺎن اﯾﻦ ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ، ﭘﻮﺷﺶ رﺳﺎﻧﻪای، اﺑﺰار ﺟﻨﮓ رواﻧﯽ، ﺟﺮﯾﺎنﺳﺎزی رﺳﺎﻧﻪای، ﺑﺴﺘﺮﺳﺎزی تحلیل اﺧﺒﺎر و ﻣﮑﻤﻞ ﺟﺮﯾﺎن ﮔﺮدش آزاد اﻃﻼﻋﺎت از ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﯾﻦ ﮐﺎرﮐﺮدﻫﺎﯾﯽ اﺳﺖ ﮐﻪ ﺷﺒﮑﻪﻫﺎی اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ در ﻣﺬاﮐﺮات ﻫﺴﺘﻪای داﺷﺘﻨﺪ.

Analysis of Virtual Networks Role in Vienna Nuclear Negotiation

Today, almost all politicians in the world are on the Internet and posting texts and reports on their accounts. The culmination of these activities can be seen during the Iran-P5 + 1 nuclear talks. The main question here is: What has been the role of social media in the Vienna nuclear negotiations? Semi-structured interviews were used to collect data. All data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis method. The results of the first sub-question showed that interaction with the public, management of public opinion and the use of English were part of the strength of the Iranian nuclear negotiating team in using social media and, on the other hand, not having Strategy, disorder, and lack of a media consultant can also be included in the list of negotiators’ weaknesses in the use of these networks. In another part of the results and in response to the second sub-question, it was revealed that breaking the monopoly of the mainstream media, raising people’s social capital towards officials and direct interaction with the people of the world and face-to-face conversation with public opinion are the most important goals. The nuclear negotiating team has been using social media to pursue it, but from the point of view of the interviewees, media coverage, tools of psychological warfare, media streaming, news analytics and complementary information flow are among the most important functions. Social media was at the core of the negotiations