|
|
ارتباط بین شدت سرپانتینی شدن و ویژگی های ژئوتکنیکی افیولیت ها (مطالعه موردی: افیولیت های پالئوتتیس جنوب غرب مشهد)
|
|
|
|
|
نویسنده
|
افشار سلمه ,غفوری محمد ,حافظی مقدس ناصر ,لشکری پور غلامرضا
|
منبع
|
زمين شناسي اقتصادي - 1398 - دوره : 11 - شماره : 4 - صفحه:645 -663
|
چکیده
|
سنگهای اولترامافیک از بخشهای مهم مجموعه افیولیتی جنوبغرب مشهد هستند که در این پژوهش در دو گروه متاپریدوتیتها و متاپیروکسنیتها مورد بررسی قرارگرفتهاند. پس از تعیین درصد سرپانتینیشدن در مقاطع نازک، آزمایشهای ژئوتکنیکی بر روی نمونههای جمعآوری شده، صورتگرفته و رفتار سنگها مقایسهشده است. نتایج نشاندهنده ارتباط نزدیک بین فرایند سرپانتینیشدن و مقاومت تکمحوری در سنگهای اولترامافیک منطقه است؛ بهطوریکه در درجه سرپانتینیتی متوسط در نمونههایی که 25 تا40 درصد سرپانتینی شدهاند، درجه مقاومت بسیار سخت (mpa250-100)، 40 تا60 درصد سرپانتینیشده مقاومت سخت (mpa100-50)،60 تا 75 درصد سرپانتین، مقاومت نسبتاً سخت (mpa50-25) و در درجه سرپانتینیتی شدید با شدت 75 تا 95 درصد مقاومت ضعیف ( mpa25-5) مشاهده می شود. مطابق این پژوهش بهدلیل درجات مختلف سرپانتینیشدن احتمال وقوع لغزش، ناپایداری و یا ریزش ترانشه در این سنگها زیاد است
|
کلیدواژه
|
سرپانتینی شدن، مقاومت فشاری تک محوری ، ویژگی های ژئوتکنیکی، افیولیت های پالئوتتیس
|
آدرس
|
دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد, دانشکده علوم, گروه زمینشناسی, ایران, دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد, دانشکده علوم, گروه زمینشناسی, ایران, دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد, دانشکده علوم, گروه زمینشناسی, ایران, دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد, دانشکده علوم, گروه زمینشناسی, ایران
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The relationship between serpentinization and geotechnical properties of ophiolites (Case study: Paleotethys ophiolites of the Southwest of Mashhad)
|
|
|
Authors
|
Afshar Salameh ,Ghafoori Mohammad ,Hafezi Moghaddas Naser ,Lashkaripour Gholam Reza
|
Abstract
|
Introduction;In the southern margin of the Mashhad plain in Northeastern Iran, there are strips with tens of kilometers length consisting of metamorphic rocks and ophiolite complexes with the NESW trend. Ophiolites are fragments of ancient Oceanic crust (Ghaseminejad and Torabi, 2015; Khanchuk et al., 2016; Shirdashtzadeh et al, 2017) most of which consists of ultramafic rocks. Ophiolites are formed during tectonic displacement in the southern part of the Mashhad plain (Alavi, 1991; Karimpour et al., 2010; Sheikholeslami and Kouhpeyma, 2012; Zanchetta et al., 2013; Shafaii Moghadam and Stern, 2014). These undergoing metamorphosed regions ultimately lead to the formation of serpentines complex due to factors of pressure and temperature. Subsequently, tectonic variations create different levels of serpentinization in the region. Different degrees of serpentines have different geotechnical properties that are discussed in this study.; ;Materials and methods;To conduct the lithological studies, 313 samples were collected from surface and trenches in the studied area. Following the preparation of the microscopic crosssection of all specimens, the mineralogical characteristics, texture changes, color changes, degradation and microcrack development were studied. Then, the samples were classified based on the general classification of ultramafic rocks (Streckeisen, 1974). According to this classification, the ultramafics extracted from the studied area were classified in the metaperidotite and metapyroxenite groups. After separating various metaperidotites and metapyroxenites the percentage of serpentinization in all specimens were determined and 60 samples with different serpentinite percentages were selected. Also, the stone blocks were provided for preparing the core samples. Physical tests (such as dry and saturated unit weights, porosity, and water absorption percentage), and mechanical tests (such as uniaxial compressive strength, point load strength, and Brazilian tensile strength) were performed based on the Brown (1981) method in the laboratory of the Ferdowsi University of Mashhad.; ;Results;The results show that there is a good relationship between the percentage of serpentinization of samples and uniaxial compressive strength (the most important geotechnical parameter in rocks). The ultramafic rocks are divided into three groups based on uniaxial strength and 25 to 40% of serpentine are very strong, 40 to 60% of serpentine are strong and 60 to 75% serpentine are of medium strength. Also, the ultramafics with 75% to 95% of serpentine, are named as serpentinite rocks with weak uniaxial compressive strength.; ;Discussion;Although most of the ultramafic rocks have good strength as the foundation for building, the construction of a structure on these rocks has numerous problems due to the formation of minerals such as serpentine and talc with onedirectional cleavage. With increasing the degree of serpentinization, some phenomena such as slope instability, sliding, excavation collapse will occur. The results of the present research indicated the priority of serpentinization degree of ultramafic rocks compared to their strength. As it is seen, although in a high degree of serpentinization, the metapyroxenites have higher strength and lower water absorption compared to metaperidotites. Therefore, the mentioned issues demonstrated the importance of the degree of serpentinization compared to strength in ultramafic rocks. ; ;Acknowledgements;The authors would like to thank Professor Mohammad Hassan Karimpour for his helpful and effective guidance on the petrography of ultramafics rocks in this paper.; ;References;Alavi, M., 1991. Sedimentary and structural characteristics of the PaleoTethys remnants in northeastern Iran. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 103(8): 983–992.;Brown, E.T. 1981. Rock characterization, Testing and monitoring ISRM suggested methods. Pergamon press, Oxford, 211 pp.;Ghaseminejad, F. and Torabi, Gh., 2015. Petrography and mineral chemistry of Twehrlites in contact zone of gabbro intrusions and mantle peridotites of the Naein ophiolite. Journal of Economic Geology, 6(2): 291–304. (in Persian with English abstract);Karimpour, M.H., Stern, C.R. and Farmer, G.L., 2010. Zircon U–Pb geochronology, Sr–Nd isotope analyses, and petrogenetic study of the Dehnow diorite and Kuhsangi granodiorite (PaleoTethys), NE Iran. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 37(4): 384–393.;Khanchuk, A.I. and Vysotsky, S.V., 2016. Differentdepth gabbro–ultrabasite associations in the SikhoteAlin ophiolites (Russian Far East). Russian Geology and Geophysics, 57(1): 141–154.;Shafaii Moghadam, H. and Stern, R.J., 2014. Ophiolites of Iran: Keys to understanding the tectonic evolution of SW Asia: (I) Paleozoic ophiolites. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 91(1): 19–38.;Sheikholeslami, M.R. and Kouhpeyma, M., 2012. Structural analysis and tectonic evolution of the eastern Binalud Mountains, NE Iran. Journal of Geodynamics, 61(1): 23–46.;Shirdashtzadeh, N., Torabi, GH. and Samadi, R., 2017. Petrography and mineral chemistry of metamorphosed mantle peridotites of Nain Ophiolite (Central Iran). Journal of Economic Geology, 9(1): 57–72. (in persian with English abstract);Streckeisen, A., 1974. Classification and nomenclature of plutonic rocks recommendations of the IUGS subcommission on the systematics of igneous rocks. Geologische Rundschau, 63(2): 773–786.
|
Keywords
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|