echoes of impoliteness: navigating identity in pinter's dual landscapes

Despite the fact that impoliteness has been the focus of much investigation in various contexts, including political and cultural, there remains a paucity of evidence on the manifestation of impoliteness in literary texts. examining harold pinter’s mountain language (1988) and ashes to ashes (1996), this paper discloses the impact of (im)politeness on identity. it posits that because of a mismatch in power dynamics and impoliteness between communicators, identity and self-esteem are subject to threat. harold pinter’s plays manifest profound interconnection between (im)politeness and identity construction/destruction. our analysis shows how, in plays under scrutiny, characters are in a constant verbal struggle for survival and dominance and how this conflict impacts on characters’ social identity. adopting bousfield and mcintyre (2018) alongside garcés-conejos blitvich (2009)’s model, this paper elucidates how impoliteness operates within the political settings of the plays in which the oppressors’ aggressive language aims to delegitimize the social identity of the oppressed ones. furthermore, we strive to indicate how the impolite language and social/individual identity are closely related which contributes to a deeper understanding of characterization in literary works. despite the fact that impoliteness has been the focus of much investigation in various contexts, including political and cultural, there remains a paucity of evidence on the manifestation of impoliteness in literary texts. examining harold pinter’s mountain language (1988) and ashes to ashes (1996), this paper discloses the impact of (im)politeness on identity. it posits that because of a mismatch in power dynamics and impoliteness between communicators, identity and self-esteem are subject to threat. harold pinter’s plays manifest profound interconnection between (im)politeness and identity construction/destruction. our analysis shows how, in plays under scrutiny, characters are in a constant verbal struggle for survival and dominance and how this conflict impacts on characters’ social identity. adopting bousfield and mcintyre (2018) alongside garcés-conejos blitvich (2009)’s model, this paper elucidates how impoliteness operates within the political settings of the plays in which the oppressors’ aggressive language aims to delegitimize the social identity of the oppressed ones. furthermore, we strive to indicate how the impolite language and social/individual identity are closely related which contributes to a deeper understanding of characterization in literary works.