تحلیل زیست ‌پذیری شهری در کلان شهر اصفهان با تاکید بر شاخص‌های اجتماعی – فرهنگی

ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ: ﺷﻬﺮ اﺻﻔﻬﺎن ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮان ﺳﻮﻣﯿﻦ ﮐﻼن ﺷﻬﺮ اﯾﺮان ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ وﺳﻌﺖ و ﻫﻤﭽﻨﯿﻦ وﺟﻮد 15 ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺷﻬﺮی در آن ﮐﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻔﺎوت ﻫﺎی اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ و ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﯽ در ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ آن وﺟﻮد دارد ﻟﺬا ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻞ و ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ دﻗﯿﻖ اﯾﻦ ﺷﺮاﯾﻂ از دﯾﺪﮔﺎه زﯾﺴﺖ ﭘﺬﯾﺮی ﺿﺮوری ﻣﯽ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ. ﻫﺪف: ﻫﺪف اﯾﻦ ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ، ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ 15ﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﺷﻬﺮ اﺻﻔﻬﺎن از ﻟﺤﺎظ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻫﺎی زﯾﺴﺖ ﭘﺬﯾﺮی اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ و ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﯽ و ﺗﻔﺎوت اﯾﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﻣﯽ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ. روش ﺷﻨﺎﺳﯽ ﺗﺤﻘﯿﻖ: روش ﺗﺤﻘﯿﻖ ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺗﻮﺻﯿﻔﯽ - ﭘﯿﻤﺎﯾﺸﯽ و از ﻟﺤﺎظ ﻫﺪف ﮐﺎرﺑﺮدی ﻣﯽ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ . ﺑﺮای ﮔﺮدآوری اﻃﻼﻋﺎت ﺑﻪ دو ﺻﻮرت ﮐﺘﺎﺑﺨﺎﻧﻪ ای و ﻣﯿﺪاﻧﯽ اﺳﺘﻔﺎده ﺷﺪه اﺳﺖ. ﺑﺎ اﺳﺘﻔﺎده از روش دﻟﻔﯽ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻌﯿﯿﻦ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻫﺎی ﻣﺘﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺤﺪوده ﻣﻮرد ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ ﭘﺮداﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪه اﺳﺖ. در اﯾ ﻦ ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ ﺑﺮای ﺗﺠﺰﯾﻪ و ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻞ داده ﻫﺎ از آزﻣﻮن ﻫﺎی ﺗﯽ ﺗﮏ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ای، ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻞ وارﯾﺎﻧﺲ ﯾﮏ ﻃﺮﻓﻪ و آزﻣﻮن ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻞ وارﯾﺎﻧﺲ ﺑﺎ اﻧﺪازه ﮔﯿﺮی ﻫﺎی ﻣﮑﺮر در ﻧﺮم اﻓﺰار spss ﺻﻮرت ﭘﺬﯾﺮﻓﺖ. ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ آﻣﺎری ﺳﺎﮐﻨﯿﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ 15 ﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﺷﻬﺮ اﺻﻔﻬﺎن ﻣﯽ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﮐﻪ ﺟﻤﻊ ﮐﻞ ﺟﻤﻌﯿﺖ ﺷﻬﺮ اﺻﻔﻬﺎن ﺑﺮاﺑﺮ ﺑﺎ 1972662 ﻧﻔﺮ ﻣﯽ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﮐﻪ ﺑﺮاﺳﺎس ﻓﺮﻣﻮل ﮐﻮﮐﺮان 682 ﺑﺮآورد ﮔﺮدﯾﺪ. ﻗﻠﻤﺮو ﺟﻐﺮاﻓﯿﺎﯾﯽ ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ: ﻗﻠﻤﺮو ﺟﻐﺮاﻓﯿﺎﯾﯽ اﯾﻦ ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ، ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ 15ﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﺷﻬﺮ اﺻﻔﻬﺎن ﻣﯽﺑﺎﺷﺪ. ﯾﺎﻓﺘﻪﻫﺎ: ﻧﺘﺎﯾﺞ آزﻣﻮن ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻞ وارﯾﺎﻧﺲ ﺑﺎ اﻧﺪازه ﮔﯿﺮی ﻣﮑﺮر ﺟﻬﺖ ﺳﻨﺠﺶ ﺗﻔﺎوت ﻫﺎ، ﻣﻌﻨﺎداری ﺗﻔﺎوت ﻣﯿﺎﻧﮕﯿﻦ ﻫﺎی ﭘﺎﺳﺦ دﻫﯽ اﯾﻦ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻫﺎ را در ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ 15 ﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﺷﻬﺮ اﺻﻔﻬﺎن ﻣﻮرد ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ اﺛﺒﺎت ﻣﯽ ﮐﻨﺪ (sig<0/05)؛ ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮاﯾﻦ ﺑﺎ 95 درﺻﺪ اﻃﻤﯿﻨﺎن ﻣﯿﺰان ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻫﺎ، دارای اﺧﺘﻼف ﻣﻌﻨﺎداری اﺳﺖ. ﻧﺘﺎﯾﺞ آزﻣﻮن ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻞ anova ﺟﻬﺖ ﺳﻨﺠﺶ ﺑﻌﺪ زﯾﺴﺖ ﭘﺬﯾﺮی اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ - ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﯽ، ﻣﻌﻨﺎداری ﺗﻔﺎوت ﻣﯿﺎﻧﮕﯿﻦﻫﺎی ﭘﺎﺳﺨﺪﻫﯽ اﯾﻦ ﻣﻮﻟﻔﻪ را در ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﻫﺎی ﻣﻮرد ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ اﺛﺒﺎت ﻣﯽﮐﻨﺪ )sig<0/05(. ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮاﯾﻦ ﺑﺎ 95 درﺻﺪ اﻃﻤﯿﻨﺎن ﺑﻌﺪ زﯾﺴﺖ ﭘﺬﯾﺮی اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﯽ در ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﻣﻮرد ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ، دارای اﺧﺘﻼف ﻣﻌﻨﺎداری اﺳﺖ. در ﻧﺘﯿﺠﻪ ﺑﺮای ﺗﻌﯿﯿﻦ اﯾﻨﮑﻪ ﺑﯿﻦ ﻣﯿﺎﻧﮕﯿﻦ ﮐﺪام ﯾﮏ از ﺳﻄﻮح ﭘﺎﺳﺨﺪﻫﯽ ﻣﺘﻐﯿﺮ، اﺧﺘﻼف ﻣﻌﻨﺎدار وﺟﻮد دارد از آزﻣﻮن ﻫﺎی ﺗﻌﻘﯿﺒﯽ tukey اﺳﺘﻔﺎده ﺷﺪ و ﻧﺘﺎﯾﺞ آن در ﺟﺪول زﯾﺮ آورده ﺷﺪ. در ﻧﺘﯿﺠﻪی اﯾﻦ آزﻣﻮن ﻣﯽﺗﻮان ﺑﯿﺎن ﮐﺮد ﮐﻪ ﺑﯿﻦ ﻣﯿﺎﻧﮕﯿﻦ ﺑﻌﺪ زﯾﺴﺖ ﭘﺬﯾﺮی اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ - ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﯽ ﻫﺮ ﮔﺮوه اﺧﺘﻼف ﻣﻌﻨﺎداری وﺟﻮد ﻧﺪارد در ﺣﺎل اﯾﻨﮑﻪ ﺑﯿﻦ ﻣﯿﺎﻧﮕﯿﻦ ﺑﻌﺪ زﯾﺴﺖ ﭘﺬﯾﺮی اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ - ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﯽ ﺑﯿﻦ ﮔﺮوهﻫﺎی ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺗﻔﺎوت ﻣﻌﻨﺎداری وﺟﻮد دارد )sig<0/05(. ﻫﻤﭽﻨﯿﻦ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﯿﺎﻧﮕﯿﻦ ﺑﻌﺪ زﯾﺴﺖ ﭘﺬﯾﺮی اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﯽ، ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ 9 ﮐﻤﺘﺮﯾﻦ ﻣﯿﺎﻧﮕﯿﻦ در اﯾﻦ ﻣﻌﯿﺎر را داﺷﺘﻪ و ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ 1 دارای ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮﯾﻦ ﻣﯿﺎﻧﮕﯿﻦ ﺑﻮده اﺳﺖ و ﺗﻔﺎوت ﺑﺎﻻﯾﯽ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ دﯾﮕﺮ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ دارد. ﻧﺘﺎﯾﺞ: اﻫﺘﻤﺎم اﺳﺎﺳﯽ اﯾﻦ ﺗﺤﻘﯿﻖ ﺳﻨﺠﺶ و ارزﯾﺎﺑﯽ زﯾﺴﺖ ﭘﺬﯾﺮی اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ- ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﯽ در ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ 15 ﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﺷﻬﺮ اﺻﻔﻬﺎن ﺑﻮده اﺳﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺘﺎﯾﺞ ﺑﻪ دﺳﺖ آﻣﺪه از دﯾﺪﮔﺎه ﺳﺎﮐﻨﺎن ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ 15 ﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﺷﻬﺮ اﺻﻔﻬﺎن، زﯾﺴﺖ ﭘﺬﯾﺮی اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ - ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﯽ در ﺷﻬﺮ اﺻﻔﻬﺎن ﭘﺎﯾﯿﻦ ﺗﺮ از ﺣﺪ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﻗﺮار دارد. اﻣﺘﯿﺎز ﺑﻪ دﺳﺖ آﻣﺪه از آزﻣﻮن t ﺗﮏ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ای ﺑﺎ در ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻋﺪد3 ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮان ﺣﺪ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻂ، ﺑﺮاﺑﺮ ﺑﺎ 2/75 ﺑﻪ دﺳﺖ آﻣﺪه اﺳﺖ. در ﺑﯿﻦ 5 ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻣﻮرد ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ در زﯾﺴﺖ ﭘﺬﯾﺮی اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ - ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﯽ، ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮﯾﻦ ﻣﯿﺎﻧﮕﯿﻦ را ﺷﺎﺧﺺ اﻋﺘﻤﺎد ﺑﻪ ﭘﻠﯿﺲ ﺑﺎ ﻣﯿﺎﻧﮕﯿﻦ 3/15 و ﺑﻌﺪ از آن ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻣﯿﺰان اﻣﻨﯿﺖ ﺣﺲ ﺷﺪه ﺑﺎ ﻣﯿﺎﻧﮕﯿﻦ 3/02 ﺑﻮده اﺳﺖ. در ﺑﯿﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﻧﯿﺰ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮﯾﻦ ﻣﯿﺎﻧﮕﯿﻦ را از ﻟﺤﺎظ زﯾﺴﺖ ﭘﺬﯾﺮی اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ - ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﯽ ﺑﺎ ﻣﯿﺎﻧﮕﯿﻦ 3/31 ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﯾﮏ ﺑﻮده اﺳﺖ و ﺑﻘﯿﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ زﯾﺮ ﻣﯿﺎﻧﮕﯿﻦ ﺑﻮده اﻧﺪ.

analysis of urban viability in isfahan metropolis with emphasis on socio-cultural indicators

introduction: the city of isfahan, as the third metropolis of iran, due to its size and also the presence of 15 urban areas in it, with social and cultural differences in its different areas, therefore, a detailed analysis and investigation ofthese conditions from the point of view of livability is necessary.research aim: the purpose of this research is to investigate the 15 districts of isfahan in terms of social and culturallivability indicators and the differences between these districts.methodology: the research method of the current research is descriptive-survey and practical in terms of purpose.both library and field methods have been used to collect information. by using the delphi method, it has beendetermined the appropriate indicators for the investigated range. in this research, to analyze data from sample t-tests,one-way analysis of variance and analysis of variance with repeated measurements were performed in spss software.the statistical population is the residents of 15 districts of isfahan city, the total population of isfahan city is equal to1972662 people, which was estimated as 682 based on cochran's formula.studied areas:the geographical scope of this research is the 15 districts of isfahan city.results: the results of analysis of variance test with repeated measurements to measure the differences, proves thesignificance of the difference between the response means of these indicators in the 15 districts of isfahan (sig<0.05). therefore, with 95% confidence, the indicators have a significant difference. the results of anova analysistest to measure the socio-cultural viability dimension prove the significance of the difference between the responsemeans of this component in the studied samples (sig <0.05). therefore, with 95% confidence in the socio-culturalviability dimension in the study areas, there is a significant difference. as a result, tukey post hoc tests were used todetermine the mean of which of the variables' response levels, and the results were given in the table below. as aresult of this test, it can be stated that there is no significant difference between the average socio-cultural viabilitydimension of each group, while there is a significant difference between the average socio-cultural viabilitydimension between different groups (sig <0.05). also, according to the average socio-cultural viability dimension,region 9 had the lowest average in this criterion and region 1 had the highest average and had a high differencecompared to other regions.conclusion: the main purpose of this study was to measure and evaluate socio-cultural viability in 15 districts ofisfahan. according to the results obtained from the perspective of residents of 15 districts of isfahan, socio-culturalviability in isfahan is below average contract. the score obtained from the one-sample t-test with the number 3 as theaverage is equal to 2.75. among the 5 indicators studied in socio-cultural viability, the highest average was the indexof trust in the police with an average of 3.15 and then the index of the level of security felt with an average of 3.02.among the regions, the highest average in terms of socio-cultural viability was with an average of 3.31 in region oneand the rest of the regions were below average.