تحلیل ارتباط مشارکت روستایی و فقرسیاسی (مطالعه موردی: روستاهای دهستان سراوان شهرستان رشت)

هدف از پژوهش حاضر بررسی رابطه بین مشارکت روستایی و وضعیت فقر سیاسی در سطح دهستان سراوان واقع در شهرستان رشت در استان گیلان می باشد. متغیرهای پیش بین تحقیق را مشارکت(در ابعاد متفاوت اجتماعی، سیاسی و خدماتی کالبدی)، شیوه نگرش به مشارکت و شیوه عمل به مشارکت و متغیر ملاک را فقر سیاسی تشکیل می دهد. نوع تحقیق به صورت کاربردی توسعه ای است و روش مطالعه اسنادی، تحلیلی و پیمایشی است. جهت تکمیل اطلاعات موجود از ابزار پرسشنامه استفاده شده است. در روش تحلیلی با توجه به فرضیه ارائه شده به معرفی هر یک از مولفه های مورد نظر اقدام شده است. بر این اساس هر مولفه با چند معرف به شناسایی میزان مشارکت افراد و نقش آن در توسعه روستایی می پردازد سپس به بررسی مولفه ی فقر در ابعاد سیاسی با استفاده از مدل رگرسیون چند گانه در نرم افزار spss صورت گرفته است. جامعه آماری تحقیق کل خانوار روستایی دهستان سراوان است، با استفاده از جدول مورگان تعداد370 نمونه انتخاب گردید. نتایج تحقیق حاکی از این موضوع است که بین فقر سیاسی و میزان مشارکت رابطه وجود دارد. بدین معنی که به ازای افزایش هر واحد در مشارکت به میزان  0.728 واحد نیز در ابعاد سیاسی فقر کاهش پیدا می کند. به عبارتی با افزایش هر یک از شاخص های مشارکت، شیوه عمل به مشارکت و نحوه نگرش نسبت به مشارکت در بعد سیاسی فقر کاهش پیدا می کند.

analysis of relationship between rural participation and poverty (case study: villages of saravan district, rasht county)

introduction human societies have gone through many ups and downs in their pursuit of growth and excellence, and in this field, the main aspiration of providing favorable economic, social, political, and so on .they have been members of the community .basically, one of the most important issues for countries in different periods is to look at ways of improvement and overall development of rural areas, and therefore rural development as one of the subdivisions of development, but also the most important one. it is a multidimensional process that aims to improve, improve the quality of life of the poor and vulnerable sections of the rural community. in addition, people's participation is a fundamental prerequisite for action that forms part of the operational aspect of development. development theory, with regard to purpose and content, emphasizes the importance of participation at all levels, from the crucial stage of identifying needs to the final stage of evaluating and implementing the program, as well as the intermediate stages of decision-making regarding goal setting, resource utilization and operations management indicates.methodologythe type of research is applied-developmental and the method is documentary, analytical and survey study .in order to complete the existing information, first class resources such as questionnaire were used .in the analytical method ،according to the presented hypothesis ،each of the components is introduced. accordingly, each component identifies the extent of individual participation and its role in rural development with a number of indicators, then examines the components of poverty in the political dimension and the relationship between these two variables of participation and political poverty using the correlation coefficient model .the software for the analysis of this research is households living in rural areas of saravan .the independent variables of the research are: participation (each of the social, political and service-physical dimensions of participation), attitude towards participation and the dependent variable is also political poverty .the statistical population of the study is the total rural households of saravan, which according to the results of the 2011 census has 6 villages and 4283 households .morgan table was used to determine the sample size of household heads living in rural areas of saravan. finally, 351 questionnaires were selected which increased to 370 for better results.result and discutionthere is a meaningful relationship between 95% and 95% confidence level for interpreting the degree of correlation between political poverty and political participation. since the pearson correlation coefficient of -0.634 indicates a negative correlation between these two variables, the greater the political participation, the less political poverty. there is a significant relationship between the two variables in the relationship between political poverty and social participation with 95% confidence and just as the previous variable, the greater the social participation, the less political poverty .to interpret the degree of correlation between political