رتبه‌بندی نواحی شهر ساری از نظر میزان برخورداری از شاخص های زیست پذیری

زیست پذیری، اساساً از اواخر قرن بیستم موردتوجه قرارگرفته است، زیرا فضاهای شهری دچار مسائلی چون کیفیت پایین محیط، آلودگی صوتی و هوا و... شده بودند. هدف این پژوهش رتبه‌بندی نواحی شهر ساری ازنظر میزان برخورداری از شاخص‌های زیست پذیری شهری است. پژوهش حاضر ازنظر هدف کاربردی و ازنظر روش توصیفی – تحلیلی می‌باشد. برای جمع‌آوری داده‌ها در این تحقیق، از دو روش اسنادی و میدانی و استفاده از پرسشنامه بهره گرفته‌شده است. که با منطق نمونه‌گیری گلوله برفی در میان 20 نفر از متخصصان برنامه‌ریزی شهری انجام‌گرفته است و مولفه‌های سه شاخص اجتماعی، زیست‌محیطی و اقتصادی در این راستا به کار گرفته شدند. برای رتبه‌بندی از روش تصمیم‌گیری چند معیاره تاپسیس بهره گرفته شد. یافته‌های پژوهش نشان داد که. به این صورت که وضعیت 5 ناحیه برخوردار و محسوب شده و سطح زیست پذیری در آن‌ها در حد متوسط قرار داشت؛ نواحی 2-1، 5-3، 1-3، 5-2 و 2-3. نظر به نقشه ارائه‌شده این نواحی در مناطق حاشیه شمالی و جنوبی شهر قرار دارند و شهروندان از رضایت بالای خود را در مورد زیست پذیری ابراز داشته‌اند. از طرفی 3 ناحیه در دست نواحی محروم قرار داشتند؛ نواحی 4-3، 7-1 و 4-2 در مورد سایر نواحی نیز ضریب اولویت کسب‌شده به‌گونه‌ای بود که می‌توان آن‌ها را در دسته نیمه برخوردار جای داد. در کل می‌توان نتیجه گرفت که 17 ناحیه از 20 ناحیه در وضعیت مطلوبی از زیست پذیری قرار دارند که این امر نشان از وضعیت متوسط زیست پذیری در شهر ساری حکایت دارد. در کل می‌توان گفت که نواحی مرکزی شهر ساری با توجه به کیفیت کم فضای سبز، بافت فرسوده، تراکم جمعیت و... ازلحاظ کیفیت زیست پذیری در وضعیت نامطلوبی قرار دارند و نیاز به توجه بیشتری دارند.

ranking of sari city areas in terms of the level of livability indicators

extended abstract introduction viability has been considered mainly since the late twentieth century, because urban spaces were plagued by issues such as poor environmental quality, noise and air pollution. the massive wave of urbanization and its problems has always added to the importance of viability and made it difficult and impossible to ignore. the purpose of this study is to rank the areas of sari in terms of urban viability indicators. things such as high level of satisfaction with neighbors and relations with them, the appropriate quality of neighborhood events and conferences and active participation in them, the existence of appropriate spaces for dialogue and expression of intimacy between the community, the existence of a sense of trust in their neighbors, existence the high participation of the people in the common affairs of the neighborhood and the high level of trust of the people of the neighborhood in each other has brought a better situation than other areas. methodology the present study is applied in terms of purpose and descriptive-analytical in terms of method. to collect data in this research, two documentary and field methods have been used. in the documentary-library method, referring to scientific articles, books, research and urban projects, and doctoral dissertations and theses, theoretical foundations and related sections were collected. in the field method, the required data were collected using a questionnaire. the logic of snowball sampling has been done among 20 urban planning specialists and the components of three social, environmental and economic indicators have been used in this regard. for the social index, the components of relations with neighbors, access and quality of educational facilities, access and the quality of health facilities, access and quality of recreational facilities, sense of security and sense of belonging and for the environmental index, components of facilities and equipment, visual quality, types of environmental pollution and green space and for the economic index, components of living conditions, housing and quality of housing, access to service, religious, commercial, transportation, and public transportation were considered. in this paper, cronbach’s alpha method was used to measure the reliability of the questionnaire, which is equal to 0.871, which is more than 0.7 and is a suitable value for humanities research. the validity of the questionnaire was also confirmed by referring to experts. topsis multi-criteria decision making method was used for ranking. findings showed that areas 1-2, 6-3 and 1-1 in the social person are in a high rank and enjoy. it is important to note that the geographical location of the areas mentioned in the map indicates that the more marginal areas of the city have a better social status. results and discussion in the environmental index of livability, the urban areas of sari are in a good condition and 4 areas are in a good condition; areas 2-1, 5-3, 5-2 and 1-1, respectively. in the geographical distribution of these areas, it can be seen that they mostly belong to the suburbs and the residents have expressed that these areas are in a good condition in the following indicators. improvement in components such as, good condition of water, electricity, telephone gas and mobile phone antenna infrastructure in the area, design and general plan suitable for the neighborhood, good condition of the neighborhood in terms of freshness and vitality and visual beauty of the neighborhood, satisfaction from low noise pollution and noise caused by construction, neighbors, etc., lack of pollution and odors caused by various wastes, proper location and access to green space in the neighborhood and satisfaction with the amount of green space in the neighborhood and .. it was more evident in these areas than in other areas.