محیط رسوبی نهشته‌های سیلیسی آواری ژوراسیک در حوضه رسوبی بینالود با توجه به منشا و تکتونیک قدیمه، شمال غرب مشهد، ایران

رسوبات ضخیم دانه‌درشت رودخانه‌ای ژوراسیک در شمال غرب مشهد روی سنگ‌های دگرگونی قدیمی به‌صورت دگرشیب نهشته شده است. دو برش از رسوبات ژوراسیک با ضخامت‌های 300 و 400 متر، اندازه‌گیری و مطالعه شده‌اند. در این توالی سه مجموعه رخساره (کنگلومرا، ماسه‌سنگ و شیل) شامل 8 رخساره سنگی gcm, gmg, gmm, sm, sh, sp, fl, fm و همچنین چهار عنصر ساختاری da, ch, sg و ff شناسایی شده است. جهت‌یافتگی قطعات گراولی بیان‌کننده جهت جریان قدیمه از شمال شرق به جنوب غرب است. وجود سطوح زیرین فرسایشی، شکل عدسی و توالی‌های رو به بالای ریزشونده حاکی از یک سیستم رودخانه‌ای نوع بریده‌بریده گراولی در یک حوضه نیمه‌گرابن نهشته‌شده است. براساس نتایج حاصل از مطالعات سنگ‌شناسی ساب آرکوز، آرکوز، لیتیک آرکوز، ساب لیت آرنایت و لیت آرنایت، ماسه‌سنگ‌های عمده شناسایی‌شده‌اند؛ همچنین براساس اجزای تشکیل‌دهنده ماسه‌سنگ‌ها، سنگ‌های پلوتونیکی و دگرگونی منشا رسوبات تشخیص داده شده است که در آب‌وهوای گرم و مرطوب نهشته شده‌اند؛ علاوه بر این مناطق کوه‌زایی مجدد (ro)، درون کراتونی (ci)، کمان‌های منفصل (da) و قاره‌های حدواسط (tc) نشان‌دهنده وضعیت تکتونیکی منطقه پژوهش هنگام رسوب‌گذاری است.

Depositional environment of Jurassic deposits in the Binalud basin, according to the provenance and paleotectonic setting, northwest of Mashhad, Iran

AbstractThe thick Jurassic fluvial coarsegrained sediments rest nonconformably on older metamorphic rocks to the northwest of Mashhad. Two sections, 300 and 400 m thick, were measured and studied through the Jurassic deposits.  In this unit, three facies assemblages, conglomerate, sandstone and shale, have been identified. They comprise eight lithofacies (Gcm, Gmg, Gmm, Sm, Sh, Sp, Fl, and Fm) and four architectural elements (Channelfill element (CH), Sediment gravity flows (SG), Downstream–accretion element (DA), and Overbank fines (FF)). The orientation of the gravel particles indicates that the direction of the paleoflow was from northeast to southwest. The presence of an erosive base, lensshaped sediment bodies, and finingupward sequences suggests a gravelly braidedriver system that  deposited in a halfgraben. Based on the results of petrological studies, subarkose, arkose, lithic arkose, sublitharenite, and litharenite are the main identified sandstone petrofacies. Also, based on the components of the sandstones, plutonic and metamorphic rocks have been identified as the source of sediments deposited in a humid climatic condition. In addition, the grain types suggest recycled orogen (RO), craton interior (CI), dissected arc (DA), and transitional continental (TC) tectonic settings of the study area during deposition.Keywords: Conglomerate, Braided river, Paleotethys, Jurassic, Binalud, Iran  Introduction The Binalud Mountains form one of the most characteristic geological zones in northeastern Iran. Stöcklin (1968), EftekharNezhad and Behroozi (1991), and Alavi (1992) considered the Binalud Mountains as the continuation of the Alborz Mountains, but Nabavi (1976) interpreted them as an incremental unit between the Alborz and Central Iran based on the similarity of the Palaeozoic succession with that of Central Iran, and the similarity of the Jurassic and Cretaceous strata and of its folding style with the Alborz mountains. The Binalud Mountains consist mainly of sedimentary, igneous, and metamorphic rocks, among which Jurassic sediments have been deposited in many areas, resting unconformably on Palaeozoic and/or Triassic sedimentary and metamorphic rocks. According to the position of the strata and sparse biostratigraphic data, an Early to earlyMiddle Jurassic age is suggested for the study deposits (Wilmsen et al., 2009a). The purpose of the present study is to figure out the identification of lithofacies and interpretation of their depositional environments. In addition, the source rocks (possibly hidden or eroded) of the Jurassic siliciclastic rocks (NW of Mashhad), and the tectonic setting of the Binalud Mountains during deposition of this formation are evaluated based on petrographic analysis. Material & MethodsTwo sections (400 and 300 m thick) to the northwest of Mashhad were measured and sampled. In total, 200 samples of sandstone and conglomerate were collected. Twentythree samples of sandstones and 20 conglomerates were selected for thin section preparation. Petrographic modal analyses were made using a Nikon Eclipse E400 polarizing microscope, with 500 point counts using the GazziDickinson method at the Islamic Azad University of Mashhad, Iran. Sandstones were classified following Folk (1980), and coarsegrained sediments were classified based on the Pettijohn classification (Pettijohn, 1975). A facies code modified from Miall’s (1996) classification was utilized, with G for conglomerate facies, S for sandstone facies, and M for mudstone facies. To measure paleocurrents, 695 imbricated clasts from conglomerate were measured in two sections and plotted on a rose diagram. Discussion of Results & Conclusion The Jurassic deposits in the study area are all siliciclastic and range in grain size from clay to pebbles. Based on field and laboratory studies, three facies assemblages, conglomerate (Gcm, Gmg, Gmm), sandstone (Sm, Sh, Sp), and shale (Fl, Fm) have been identified. Architectural elements are defined as CH, SG, DA, and FF. The paleoflow direction is consistent with the palaeoreconstructed position of the Jurassic deposits and indicates that sediment was transported from northeast to southwest.The lack of any marine fossils and the abundance of plant fossils in the finergrained parts clearly point to a nonmarine setting. The conglomerates and pebbly sandstones can be interpreted as the fills of braided river channels in an alluvial fan system (Wilmsen et al. 2009a; Poursoltani et al. 2015, Poursoltani and Fursich 2020). Medium to coarsegrained sandstones with planar lamination and occasional trough crossstratification can be interpreted as part of fluvial channel fills deposited during times of waning flow velocity. Fine to very finegrained sandstones, some with plant fragments, interbedded with siltstones and mudstones represent overbank sediments. The mudstones and shales are floodplain deposits.Petrographically, the sandstones are fine to mediumgrained and grainsupported, with some coarsegrained and wellrounded components. Based on Folk’s classification (1980), the sandstones are predominantly subarkose, arkose, lithic arkose, sublitharenite, and litharenite. Based on the petrographic analysis of the Jurassic sandstones, plotted on the diagrams of Dickinson et al. (1983) and Yerino and Maynard (1984), craton interior, recycled orogen, quartzose recycled, mixed zone, and transitional continental are the main tectonic settings of the studied sediments. Basu’s diagram (Basu et al., 1985, with Qp, Qm u, Qm, nu) indicates that metamorphic rocks were the main source area of the deposits. In the Q–F–R ternary diagram of Suttner et al. (1981), the Jurassic sandstones plot in the field for plutonic and metamorphic source areas under humid climate conditions.According to previous studies (Wilmsen et al., 2009a; Sheikholeslami and Kouhpeyma 2012) and the result of this study, the nonmarine Jurassic succession was possibly related to the early Middle Jurassic MidCimmerian Tectonic Event. Thus, we suggest that the Jurassic strata of the Binalud Mountains were deposited in a halfgraben. This graben formed within the Cimmerian mountain belt and developed during a late phase of the Early Cimmerian Orogenic Event