تحولات مطلق بودن حق مالکیت خصوصی و تاثیر آن بر مسئولیت مالک نسبت به وارد غیرمجاز

ازجمله چالش‌های حقوق در هر جامعه ایجاد تعادل بین حق‌ها و منافع متعارض است. مهم‌ترین حق در عالم حقوق حق حیات افراد است. از دیگر سو، حق مالکیت خصوصی افراد نیز جزء حقوق بنیادین افراد در هر جامعه است. بااین‌حال این دو حق ممکن است در عمل با یکدیگر در تزاحم قرار بگیرند. این مقاله به دنبال آن است تا نشان دهد چگونه تغییر دیدگاه جامعه نسبت به مطلق بودن حق مالکیت خصوصی و برتری یافتن اهمیت کرامت انسان‌ها، منجر به تغییر احکام در حدود امکان تصرفات مالکانه راجع به افرادی شده است که بدون مجوز وارد ملک دیگری می‌شوند. به‌عنوان نتیجه و دستاورد پژوهش باید گفت، مطلق بودن حق مالکیت که از قرن 17 میلادی اوج گرفته بود کم کم در اثر فشارهای اجتماعی از اواخر قرن 19 میلادی افول کرده و انواع و اقسام محدودیت‌ها بر آن وارد شد و به تعبیری اجتماعی شد. توجه به این تحول فکری به درک بهتر قوانین و مقررات و تغییرات آن‌ها کمک می‌کند. ازجمله این محدودیت‌ها این است که برخلاف گذشته که مالک دارای قدرت مطلق در هرگونه تصرفی در ملک خودش بود، امروزه مکلف است حتی در ملک خود از انجام برخی اقدامات خطرناک خودداری کند و اقدام‌های احتیاطی لازم را انجام دهد و دیگر نمی‌تواند با تمسک به‌قاعده تسلط (تسلیط) و مطلق بودن مالکیت خود، به‌طورکلی از مسئولیت در مقابل افراد دیگر، حتی آنکه غیرمجاز وارد ملک شده باشند، رها شود. قانون مجازات اسلامی هم در آخرین تحول در سال 1392، این تکلیف مالک را به رسمیت شناخته است.

changes in the absolute nature of private property rights and its impact on the owner’s responsibility towards illegal entrants

this article explores the evolving balance between the right to life and the right to private property. it examines how societal shifts have led to restrictions on the absolute nature of property ownership and how these changes have influenced legal rulings regarding the responsibilities of property owners toward unauthorized entrants.one of the fundamental challenges in any society is to reconcile conflicting rights and interests. the right to life and the right to private property are two such rights that can sometimes clash. traditionally, property ownership was viewed as an absolute right, granting the owner complete dominion over their property. however, as societal values have evolved, there has been a growing recognition that the right to life is paramount and that property owners cannot exercise their rights in a way that infringes upon the rights of others.the concept of absolute ownership has its roots in individualism, which posits that each person’s property is their personal domain. this idea has been challenged by the increasing emphasis on social responsibility and the need to protect the rights of all individuals. as a result, various restrictions have been imposed on property ownership, limiting the absolute power that owners once enjoyed.one significant factor that has contributed to these changes is the strengthening of the idea that human life and dignity must be respected. the right to life is considered the most fundamental of all rights, and it takes precedence over other rights in cases of conflict. this principle is enshrined in international human rights law, including the universal declaration of human rights and the international covenant on civil and political rights.   in islam, the qur’an clearly states that the right to life is the most important right. taking the life of another is considered equivalent to killing the entire society. this principle is reflected in the declaration of islamic human rights, which guarantees the right to life and prohibits any aggression against it.the view that property owners have absolute power to control their property, even if this leads to harm or damage to others, has gradually been abandoned. this shift in thinking is evident in the laws of many countries and in the opinions of legal experts. today, the arguments in favor of human life are given more weight than those supporting property rights.in iran, the islamic penal code has been amended to reflect these changing views. articles 507 and 508 of the code now impose restrictions on property owners in their dealings with unauthorized entrants. this represents a significant departure from the previous approach, which held property owners harmless for any harm caused to unauthorized entrants.in conclusion, the absolute nature of property ownership has declined over time due to societal pressures and a growing emphasis on human rights. this shift in thinking has led to restrictions on property owners’ rights and a greater recognition of their responsibilities towards others. by understanding this intellectual evolution, we can better appreciate the laws and regulations that govern property rights today.