شناسایی و تحلیل دعاوی متداول بین مشارکت های مشاوران و پیمانکاران در قراردادهایepc به روش ahp

ﮐﺎرﻓﺮﻣﺎﯾﺎن و ﭘﯿﻤﺎﻧﮑﺎران اﯾﺮاﻧﯽ ﻫﻢاﮐﻨﻮن ﺑﺎ آزﻣﻮدن روش engineering procurement construction epc در ﭼﻨﺪﯾﻦ و ﭼﻨﺪ ﭘﺮوژه ﺑﺰرگ و ﮐﻮﭼﮏ، ﻧﯿﺎزﻣﻨﺪ ﻫﻢﻓﮑﺮی و ﻧﻘﺪ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﯿﺎت ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺮای اﺻﻼح ﻣﺸﮑﻼت اﯾﻦ روش در اﯾﺮان و درﻧﺘﯿﺠﻪ ﺗﮑﺎﻣﻞ آن ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ. روش ﺗﺤﻘﯿﻖ در ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺑﺮ اﺳﺎس ﻫﺪف، از ﻧﻮع ﺗﺤﻘﯿﻖ ﮐﺎرﺑﺮدی و ﺑﺮاﺳﺎس روش، از ﻧﻮع ﺗﻮﺻﯿﻔﯽ- ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻠﯽ اﺳﺖ. ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ آﻣﺎری آن دﺳﺖ اﻧﺪرﮐﺎران، ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﯽ و ﻣﺪﯾﺮان در ﺣﻮزه ﭘﺮوژهﻫﺎی ﻋﻤﺮاﻧﯽ ﺑﺎ ﻗﺮارداد epc ﻣﯽﺑﺎﺷﺪ. ﺷﺎﺧﺺﻫﺎی ﺑﻪدﺳﺖآﻣﺪه از ﻃﺮﯾﻖ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎت ﮐﺘﺎﺑﺨﺎﻧﻪای و ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪﻫﺎی ﺣﻀﻮری ﺑﺎ ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺎن و ﺻﺎﺣﺐﻧﻈﺮان در ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﭼﻬﺎر دﺳﺘﻪ ﮐﻠﯽ ﺳﻄﺢ ﯾﮏ و 24 زﯾﺮﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺳﻄﺢ 2 ﻣﻮرد ﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﯾﯽ ﻗﺮار ﺧﻮاﻫﺪ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ، ﭘﺲ از ﺟﻤﻊآوری اﻃﻼﻋﺎت ﭘﯿﺮاﻣﻮن ﮐﻠﯿﻪ ﮔﺰﯾﻨﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺎﺧﺺﻫﺎی ﺗﻌﯿﯿﻦﺷﺪه، ﺑﻪﻣﻨﻈﻮر ارزﯾﺎﺑﯽ و اﻧﺘﺨﺎب ارﺟﺢﺗﺮﯾﻦ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ زﯾﺮﮔﺮوهﻫﺎی ﻣﺮﺑﻮط و اوﻟﻮﯾﺖﺑﻨﺪی آنﻫﺎ، از ﻣﻌﯿﺎرﻫﺎی ﺗﺼﻤﯿﻢﮔﯿﺮی ﺑﺎ ﺷﺎﺧﺺﻫﺎی ﭼﻨﺪﮔﺎﻧﻪ اﺳﺘﻔﺎده ﮔﺮدﯾﺪه اﺳﺖ. در اﯾﻦ ﺗﺤﻘﯿﻖ ﺑﺎ اﺳﺘﻔﺎده از روش analytical hierarchy process ahp ﺑﻪ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﯾﯽ و ﺳﭙﺲ اوﻟﻮﯾﺖﺑﻨﺪی و وزندﻫﯽ ﺷﺎﺧﺺﻫﺎی اراﺋﻪﺷﺪه در اﯾﻦ ﻣﺒﺤﺚ ﭘﺮداﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪه اﺳﺖ، ﻣﻌﯿﺎر ﻋﺪم اﻧﺠﺎم ﺗﻌﻬﺪات ﻗﺮاردادی ﮐﺎرﻓﺮﻣﺎ و ﻣﺸﺎور ﺑﺎ وزن 0/523 ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﯾﻦ ﻣﻌﯿﺎر در ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻞ و ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ دﻋﺎوی ﻣﺘﺪاول ﻓﯽﻣﺎﺑﯿﻦ ﻣﺸﺎوران و ﭘﯿﻤﺎﻧﮑﺎران در ﻗﺮاردادﻫﺎی epc ﭘﺮوژهﻫﺎی ﻋﻤﺮاﻧﯽ ﻣﯽﺑﺎﺷﺪ و ﻋﻮاﻣﻞ اﺷﺘﺒﺎه در اﺳﻨﺎد ﻣﻨﺎﻗﺼﻪ ﺑﺎ وزن 0/089 کم اهمیت ترین معیار از بین 4 میعار اصلی موجود می باشد.

identification and analysis of common claims between consultants and contractors in epc contracts by ahp method

today, iranian employers and contractors using the epc method in several large and small projects, need to analyze previous experiences to correct the problems of this method and develop it in future projects. in this research, first, by identifying the common lawsuits between the group of consulting engineers and contractors in the country’s construction projects and ranking the existing lawsuits, it analyzes and examines it so that it can provide solutions for reforming the country’s technical executive system by carefully examining the influential factors. the indicators obtained through library studies and face-to-face interviews with experts will be identified in the form of 4 general categories level one and 24 sub-indicators level 2 , after collecting information about all options. according to the determined indicators, in order to evaluate and select the most preferred index by the relevant subgroups and prioritize them, decision criteria with multiple indicators have been used. in this research, using ahp method, the indicators presented in this topic have been identified and then prioritized and weighted. the criterion of non-fulfillment of contractual obligations of employer and consultant with weight 0.523 is the most important criterion in analyzing and reviewing claims. common among us consultants and. contractors in epc contracts are construction projects and the wrong factors in the tender documents with weight 0.089 are the least important criteria among the 4 main criteria available.