a critical evaluation of schellenberg’s divine hiddenness argument based on avicenna’s ontological and epistemological foundations

Atheists have long advanced arguments against the existence of god, challenging the claims of theists. among these, john l. schellenberg has proposed an argument known as “divine hiddenness,” which has garnered significant attention from philosophers of religion. therefore, the subject of this paper is to critique and examine this argument based on the ontological foundations of avicenna, one of the greatest theist philosophers and prominent figures in islamic philosophy. the methodology of this article is descriptive-analytical, based on an ontological examination of the rational possibility of connection and the occurrence of connection with the transcendent through religious and mystical experiences. through a careful examination, it will be demonstrated that avicenna’s ontological foundations not only support the possibility of relational experiences with the divine but also, when considered within the framework of logical argumentation and the epistemological certainty of mutawātirāt (mass-transmitted hadith), establish the reliability and certainty of such transcendent relations. consequently, the argument from divine hiddenness—and by extension, atheism—is effectively refuted.

a critical evaluation of schellenberg’s divine hiddenness argument based on avicenna’s ontological and epistemological foundations

atheists have long advanced arguments against the existence of god, challenging the claims of theists. among these, john l. schellenberg has proposed an argument known as “divine hiddenness,” which has garnered significant attention from philosophers of religion. therefore, the subject of this paper is to critique and examine this argument based on the ontological foundations of avicenna, one of the greatest theist philosophers and prominent figures in islamic philosophy. the methodology of this article is descriptive-analytical, based on an ontological examination of the rational possibility of connection and the occurrence of connection with the transcendent through religious and mystical experiences. through a careful examination, it will be demonstrated that avicenna’s ontological foundations not only support the possibility of relational experiences with the divine but also, when considered within the framework of logical argumentation and the epistemological certainty of mutawātirāt (mass-transmitted hadith), establish the reliability and certainty of such transcendent relations. consequently, the argument from divine hiddenness—and by extension, atheism—is effectively refuted.