god, love, and interreligious dialogue

The monotheistic religions that valorize love typically believe that their love for god should be extended to god’s creatures and, in particular, to one’s fellow human beings. yet, in practice, the love of the christian or muslim or hindu monotheist doesn’t always extend to the love of the religious other. precisely how, then, should the adherents of the major monotheistic religions respond to the obvious diversity of these religions? the arguments of philosophical theology largely depend on what john henry newman called our illative sense or faculty of informal reasoning. even the most fully developed illative sense can vary from one person to another, however. as a consequence, christian, muslim, and hindu monotheists are unlikely to fully agree on matters of philosophical theology. i argue that this precludes neither mutual respect, though, nor a rational adherence to the philosophical and theological views of one’s own tradition.

God, Love, and Interreligious Dialogue

The monotheistic religions that valorize love typically believe that their love for God should be extended to God’s creatures and, in particular, to one’s fellow human beings. Yet, in practice, the love of the Christian or Muslim or Hindu monotheist doesn’t always extend to the love of the religious other. Precisely how, then, should the adherents of the major monotheistic religions respond to the obvious diversity of these religions? The arguments of philosophical theology largely depend on what John Henry Newman called our illative sense or faculty of informal reasoning. Even the most fully developed illative sense can vary from one person to another, however. As a consequence, Christian, Muslim, and Hindu monotheists are unlikely to fully agree on matters of philosophical theology. I argue that this precludes neither mutual respect, though, nor a rational adherence to the philosophical and theological views of one’s own tradition.