دفاع کراجکی از حقانیت اسلام (با تکیه بر داده‎‍های تاریخی کتاب کنزالفوائد)

تنوع ترکیب عقیدتی ساکنان مصر و شام و تساهل مذهبی فاطمیان در قرن چهارم و پنجم هجری، مسلمانان را با چالش‎‍ها و شبهات جدیدی مواجه کرد. این امر توجه خاص اندیشمندان مسلمان را به حفظ انسجام و تثبیت عقیدۀ معتقدان به دین اسلام در این مناطق به‌دنبال داشت. پویایی ابوالفتح کراجکی (م.449ق) و توجه پنهان و آشکار او در نگارش آثارش به دفاع از حقانیت دین اسلام، با این مقدمه فهم‌پذیر است؛ از این رو، با در نظر داشتن روش متکلمان آن دوره یعنی استفاده از تاریخ- در کنار حدیث و استدلال عقلی- برای اثبات عقاید، پرسش اصلی پژوهش حاضر، نحوۀ بهره‎‍گیری کراجکی از گزارش‎‍های تاریخی برای دفاع از اسلام ‎‍است. نتیجۀ این پژوهش که با رویکرد معناکاوی و بهره‎‍گیری از مفهوم «انگاره» انجام شده است، نشان می‎‍دهد روش کراجکی در دفاع از حقانیت اسلام، پیوندزدن وقایع تاریخی مشهور با جنبه‎‍های اعجازی کتاب خدا (خبر از آینده) و زندگی پیامبر(ص) بوده ‎‍است؛ امری ‎‍که امکان وقوع معجزات را پذیرفتنی‎‍تر ‎‍کرده ‎و نفی انگاره‎‍های ایجادشده توسط مسیحیان در منطقه و ایجاد دو انگارۀ «ما هم مانند آنها هستیم» (با برجسته‎‍سازی اشتراک معجزات پیامبران) و «ما بهتر از آنها هستیم» (پیوند معجزات و پیشگویی‎‍ها با تاریخ به وقوع پیوسته) را به‌دنبال داشته ‎‍است. در این روش، پذیرش این معجزات یا انگاره‎‍ها، با پذیرش حقانیت پیامبر خدا(ص) و قرآن همراه بوده و درنهایت تثبیت عقیدۀ حقانیت دین اسلام را سبب می‎‍شده ‎‍است.

karajaki’s defense of the authenticity of islam (based on the historical data in kanz al-fava’id)

in the fourth and fifth centuries of hijri, muslims faced new challenges and doubts based on the diversity of the ideological composition of egyptian and levant inhabitants and the religious tolerance of the fatimids. the special attention of muslim scholars was instrumental in maintaining the coherence and consolidation of muslim beliefs related to islam in these areas. the covert and overt attention can be understood from this point of view in abu al-fath karajaki’s writings to defend the righteousness of islam (449 ad). therefore, the central question of the current research has arisen when considering the method of the theologians of that period, which was to use history along with hadith and rational reasoning to prove their beliefs, and karajaki’s way of using historical reports to defend islam. this study was conducted using the meaning analysis approach and the concept of ‘schemata’. it shows that karajaki’s method was to link famous historical events in defending the authenticity of islam with the miraculous aspects of god’s book (news of the future) and the prophet’s life (pbuh). it makes the possibility of miracles more acceptable. as christians created the negation of the schemata in the region, it led to the creation of the ideas ‘we are like them’ (by emphasizing the commonality of the prophets’ miracles) and ‘we are better than them’ (miracles and prophecies connected with history). in this way, the approval of the authenticity of the prophet (pbuh) and the qur’an are in line with the approval of these miracles or schemata. finally, it has also led to the establishment of the legitimacy of islam.introductionmuslims and followers of other religions have some duties concerning the emergence and activity of some imami scholars in the areas where muslims interact with followers of other faiths. it was preserving the unity and belief of imami shi’a and protecting the integrity of islam. a study on egypt and the levant was one of them due to the historical background, geographical location, and religious tolerance of the fatimids. the imami scholars followed it in their writing regardless of the debates, which were oral matters. therefore, the study of some scholars’ works such as karajaki (449 ad), who was active in the levant and egypt is remarkable from this point of view. karajaki is a person who is well versed in many other sciences instead of history, hadith, and theology. he has written many books.the way he wrote kanz al-fava’id was based on some historical data to defend islam as a worthy consideration issue. the focus of karajaki’s thought on this matter is revealed in his works, as it is the existence of a rebuttal entitled risala al-damiġa le al-nasara in the list of his works.materials and methodsthe semantic analysis approach was used in this research. in this approach, every text is assumed to be affected by the author’s opinion. therefore, the how and why to write is understood especially through the connection between the text, the author, and the life of his political-ideological world.