لقب سازی های سیاسی فرودستان در دورۀ قاجاریه؛ عصر پیشامشروطه

در عصر پیشامشروطه لقب سازی برای نخبگان حاکم یکی از جلوه های منازعۀ سیاسی بین فرودستان و ارباب قدرت بود. توده ها در واکنش به القاب اغراق آمیزی که حکومت قاجاریه برای اجزا و عناصر خود در نظر می گرفت، لقب های تحقیرآمیزی را منتشر می کردند. ظرافت و طنزآمیزی این لقب ها مخاطب را به انتقال سریع آن به دیگران تشویق می کرد. این القاب، بخشی از روایت فرودستان از وضعیت کشور و زمامداران بود که در واکنش به روایت رسمی حکومت شکل می گرفت. عامه با ساختن این القاب، ادعای آبادانی کشور و اقتدار حکومت را نفی و برتری ذاتی نخبگان حاکم بر فرودستان را با تاکید بیشتری رد می کردند. در واقع آن ها با ساختن لقب های سیادت ستیز، سلطۀ منزلتی فرادستان را به چالش می کشیدند. چهارچوب نظری پژوهش، نظریۀ روایت های نهانی جیمز سی. اسکات (james c. scott) است .

Political entitle in Qajar era,PreConstitution age

In Qajar age , in political conflict between people and the governors, the masses were making humilating nicknames for the governors. These nicknames published against highflown titles that governors were making for themselves. Nicknames that were publishing by the people were very humorous and innovative. These properties published them very fast in the country. These nicknames were a seat of the transcript of the masses about situation of the country against the government transcript. In these nicknames , the masses rejected the claims of the governors about their authority and development of the country, but they emphasized to reject inherent superiority of the governors. The theorical framework of of this reaserch is “ The Hidden Transcripts” of James C. Scott. In Qajar age , in political conflict between people and the governors, the masses were making humilating nicknames for the governors. These nicknames published against highflown titles that governors were making for themselves. Nicknames that were publishing by the people were very humorous and innovative. These properties published them very fast in the country. These nicknames were a seat of the transcript of the masses about situation of the country against the government transcript. In these nicknames , the masses rejected the claims of the governors about their authority and development of the country, but they emphasized to reject inherent superiority of the governors. The theorical framework of of this reaserch is “ The Hidden Transcripts” of James C. Scott.