تبیین و ارزیابی مولفه‌های رنج وجودی انسان و ارتباط آن با خدا در دیدگاه آلبر کامو

این پژوهش در پی تبیین و ارزیابی مولفه‌های رنج وجودی انسان و ارتباط آن با خدا در اندیشۀ کامو و پیامدهای تربیتی و اخلاقی آن است. این مقاله با روش توصیفی_ تحلیلی در پی پاسخگویی به این پرسش است که کامو به‌عنوان یک اگزیستانسیالیست نسبت به مولفه‌های رنج وجودی انسان چه رویکردی دارد؟ نتایج تحلیل‌ها نشان می‌دهد که کامو این رنج‌ها را عامل پوچی و بی‌معنایی زندگی تلقی می‌کند و موطن اصلی این رنج‌ها در دیدگاه الحادی او، غیبت و یا سکوت خداوند و به‌تبع آن توجیه‌ناپذیری ذاتی زندگی است که وضعیت متناقضی برای انسان در این مواجهه پدید می‌آورد. بااین‌حال، کامو انسان را با روش‌های مختلفی به مبارزه علیه این رنج‌ها و بی‌معنایی حاصل از آن دعوت می‌کند و نوعی برنامۀ عملی به او می‌دهد که طغیان مهم‌ترین عنصر این برنامه است.

the components of human existential suffering and their relationship with god from albert camus’ perspective

the present research seeks to explain and evaluate the components of human existential suffering and their relationship with god in camus’ perspective and itheir educational and moral consequences. this article, with a descriptive-analytical method, seeks to answer the question of what approach camus, as an existentialist, has towards the components of human existential suffering. our analysis revealed that camus believes these sufferings cause absurdity and meaninglessness of life. in his atheistic view, the main source of these sufferings is the absence or silence of god. accordingly, the inherent inexcusability of life creates a contradictory situation for humans in this encounter. however, camus invites human to fight against these sufferings and their resulting meaninglessness in different ways and gives them a kind of practical plan in which rebellion is the most important element.introductionalbert camus is a famous french writer, existentialist and winner of the nobel prize for literature, who depicted concepts such as death, alienation, and the emptiness of man in the world through the existentialist approach in his works. camus considers these concepts a special kind of suffering, whose burden is on the shoulders of both existence and humans. in this view of existence, god has left humans in the world with his absence, but humans, in this situation, can choose rebellion instead of vanity and seek to create their own values. can it be said that his perception of the sufferings of human existence is placed under his atheistic attitude? what are the criticisms of his interpretation of each of these sufferings? what is the place of ethics in camus’ worldview and the educational consequences of the outrageous ethics that he portrays?regarding the literature and background of the research, we can refer to publications such as: in search of which meaning; criticism and review of camus’ view on the meaning of life by ali fathi and the meaning of life in camus’ view by mansour nasiri and muhaddeseh sharifian, a life worth living by robert zaretsky, from suffering to treasure: an analysis of three approaches to eduction role of suffering by zahra asgari and  camus and the problem of evil by b.