نظریه‌های عدالت و کاربردهای آن‌ها در عرصه ی سیاست‌گذاری آموزشی ایران (مطالعه ی موردی: سهمیه های پذیرش دانشجو)

هدف این پژوهش تحلیل یکی از مهمترین سیاست‌های پذیرش دانشجو در ایران یعنی سیاست سهمیه‌بندی و ایجاد سهمیه برای برخی داوطلبان از منظر عدالت است. برای رسیدن به این هدف، از روش توصیفی_ تحلیلی بهره برده شد؛ شیوۀ گردآوری داده‌ها نیز مطالعات کتابخانه‌ای (مطالعۀ اسناد و ادبیات) بود؛ سپس برای تحلیل آن اسناد از دو نظریۀ مهم عدالت یعنی نظریه‌های جان رالز و آمارتیاسن استفاده شد. برای به ‌دست آوردن اعتمادپذیری پژوهش نیز، جزئیات مربوط به چگونگی استخراج مفاهیم ودلالت‌ها از دو نظریۀ یادشده نشان داده شد، جزئیات داده‌ها ذکر شد، مثال‌های فراوان آورده شد و در پایان نیز نتایج پژوهش با پژوهش‌های پیشین مورد مقایسه قرار گرفت. نتایج تحلیل به ‌طور کلی نشان می‌دهند که از آن جهت که جان رالز افزون بر برابری در فرایند، برابری در نتایج را هم لازم می‌دانست، طبق شرایطی بر اساس نظریۀ او ایجاد سهمیه عادلانه است؛ برخلاف آمارتیاسن که تاکید بیشترش بر برابری در فرایند است تا برابری در نتایج؛ بنابراین بر اساس نظریۀ آمارتیاسن، توانمندسازی و ایجاد قابلیت به جای دادن سهمیه توصیه می‌شود. همچنین یافته‌های پژوهش نشان می‌دهند که بر اساس کاربست نظریۀ عدالت به ‌مثابه انصاف جان رالز، ایجاد سهمیه زمانی عادلانه خواهد بود که مصداق تبعیض روا باشد و در غیر این‌صورت، از آن جهت که اصل فرصت برابر داوطلبین برای ورود به دانشگاه‌ها را نقض می‌کند، موجب بی‌عدالتی در جامعه می‌شود. افزون بر این، زمانی می‌توان از منصفانه و عادلانه بودن سهمیه اطمینان حاصل کرد که مسئلۀ تعارض منافع در نظام تصمیم‌گیری و سیاست‌گذاری پذیرش دانشجو حل شود.

theories of justice and their applications in the field of educational policy in iran(case study: student admission quotas)

the student admission system of any country can lead to justice when its policies are fair.  in this regard, the objective of this study is to analyze one of the most important student admission policies in iran, namely the quota policy and creating quotas for some candidates from the perspective of justice. to this end, this descriptive-analytical study used library studies (study of documents and literature) for data collection. therefore, among all the documents related to student admission quotas (research community), documents related to student admission quotas after the islamic revolution were selected as the research sample. then, two important theories of justice, namely the theories of john rawls and sen, were used to analyze those documents. the trustworthiness of the research was confirmed through showing the details of how to derive the concepts and meanings from the two theories, mentioning the details of the data, and presenting many examples. finally, the research results were compared with those of other studies. the results of the analysis generally show that since john rawls, in addition to equality in process, considered equality in outcome, according to his theory, it is fair to create a quota based on conditions. unlike rawls, sen places more emphasis on equality in process than equality in outcome. therefore, according to sen’s theory, empowerment and capability building are recommended instead of quotas. furthermore, the results of the analysis show that according to rawls’s theory of justice, it is fair to create a quota when discrimination is positive. otherwise, it will cause injustice in the society because it violates the principle of equal opportunity for the candidates to enter the universities. it is also possible to ensure that the quota is fair when the problem of conflict of interest is resolved in the student admissions decision-making and policy-making system.introduction                                                       a country’s education system can reduce the grounds of injustice in different parts of society because the disadvantaged classes of society can access better jobs with a good education system and then have sufficient facilities in other areas (health, nutrition, salaries, etc.) (walzer, 1984: 197). education system is governed by the educational policies formulated by policymakers. thus, an education system can lead to justice when its policies are fair.one of the most important policies implemented in iran after the islamic revolution was the policy of creating university entrance quotas for some volunteers. in general, one of the reasons for creating quotas in society is creating justice in society (zarei and mahmoudi, 2013). therefore, it is necessary to examine and analyze how fair these quotas are. as mentioned, this research discusses one of the important principles of creating quotas. therefore, the purpose of this study is to review and analyze the policy of creating quotas in the student admission system in iran from the perspective of justice.there are different theories about justice, but we used only two theories of justice, namely john rawls’s theory of justice as fairness and sen’s capability approach to analyze the policy of creating quotas. rawls’s idea of justice as fairness embodies two principles:principle 1: individuals have the right to equality in relation to fundamental freedoms;principle 2: social and economic inequalities should occur only if:a: inequalities benefit everyone, in other words, they have the most benefit for the most disadvantaged people of the society;b: these inequalities relate to positions and situations to which everyone has equal access (rawls, 1999: 53).according to rawls, our choice about the principles of justice takes place in a situation called the veil of ignorance (meyer and sanklecha, 2016: 17).