عوامل و الزامات موثر بر توسعه آموزش شهروندی در مدارس متوسطه شهر تهران

این پژوهش با هدف شناسایی عوامل موثر بر توسعه آموزش شهروندی در مدارس دوره متوسطه شهر تهران انجام گردید. پژوهش حاضر از نظر &هدف& کاربردی و از نظر نوع داده ها، &کیفی& و از نظر شیوه اجرا &تحلیل مضمون& می باشد. داده های این پژوهش حاصل مصاحبه ی نیمه ساختار یافته با مشارکت 20 تن از &صاحبنظران آموزش شهروندی&، «مدیران ارشد آموزش و پرورش» و «مدیران و دبیران مدارس متوسطه شهر تهران» بوده که به شیوه نمونه گیری نظری و هدفمند انتخاب شده اند. این داده ها در 3 مرحله ی کدگذاری باز، محوری و انتخابی تحلیل شده است. یافته ها از نظر شاخص تکرارپذیری و پایایی بین دو کدگذار مورد تایید است. یافته های پژوهش در 40 مقوله فرعی، 12 مقوله اصلی و 3 طبقه تحت عناوین عوامل درون نهادی، فرا نهادی و بین نهادی طبقه بندی گردید. براساس نظرات اشباع یافته خبرگان &بینش استراتژیک&، &برنامه درسی مرتبط با موضوع شهروندی&، &معلمان متخصص و متعهد&، &تسهیم دانش و تجربه& ،&توسعه و نگهداشت سرمایه انسانی& ، &استقرار نظام ارزیابی و بازخور&، &فرهنگ و جو اجتماعی& در عامل درون نهادی ؛ &حکمروایی& ، &فرهنگ عمومی& و & تامین امکانات و منابع مالی& در عامل فرا نهادی و &مشارکت و شبکه سازی& و&همسازی مدرسه و خانواده& در عامل بین نهادی از عوامل موثر بر توسعه آموزش شهروندی در مدارس متوسطه شهر تهران می باشد.

Factors and requirements affecting the development of citizenship education in high schools in Tehran

AbstractThe present study was conducted to identify the factors affecting the development of citizenship education in high schools in Tehran. This applied qualitative study used content analysis to examine the data were extracted from semistructured interviews with 20 &citizenship education specialists&, &senior education managers& and &principals and teachers of high schools in Tehran& who were selected by theoretical and purposive sampling. These data were encoded in open, axial and selective stages. Repeatability and reliability of the results were confirmed by two coders. The study results were categorized into 40 subcategories, 12 main categories and three themes under intrainstitutional, transinstitutional and interinstitutional factors.IntroductionCitizenship is affected by social, political and cultural developments of the poststructuralistic era, and has found its place in research in this field as a sensitive education issue. The main reason for considering this issue is the role that a citizen has in the comprehensive development of the country. Unfortunately, the education system in Iran lacks a theoretical model for education and development of citizenship competencies throughout its long history (Aghazadeh, 2006). The negative effects of these conditions have not helped educators and those involved in education in Iran to accurately define the educational ideals. The results of studies conducted on the education system suggest that the existing program is the outcome of an agreement between the planning group members and academic experts rather than consideration of the students’ and society’s needs (Mehrmohammadi, 2013; Hazeri Khalili, 2014). Article 26 of the Dakar Framework for Action urges governments to respect and protect schools as sanctuaries and peace zones. As such, educational programs should be so designed to promote the full development of human character and profound respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms (UNESCO, 2017). Like other social institutions, schools derive their purpose, mode of action, responsibility, and method from their ruling society and culture, and the society’s quality is determined by the type of education received (Shariatmadari, 2016). Such understanding turns schools to a place to practice life and experience different fields. Therefore, what can explain the main mission and philosophy of the formation and development of schools in the current era is education of citizenship, in other words, schools should function as a &school of life& (Gootheg, 2016). If education is accepted as a pillar of generating civic awareness, the question will arise; “what factors and requirements affect the development of citizenship education?”.MethodThis applied qualitative study used content analysis to explore the factors affecting the development of citizenship education in high schools in Tehran. The potential participants include experts in the subject matter, policy makers and senior education managers, school principals and teachers in Tehran. A theoretical and purposive sampling approach was used, and to ensure the diversity in the samples, 20 individuals were asked to take part. The data were collected using semistructured interviews; each lasting 60 minutes on average. The researcher conducted interviews to obtain the participants’ views according to the principle of theoretical sensitivity, the balance of objectivity and sensitivity, taking analytical notes, and observing professional and ethical principles. In qualitative studies, data are analyzed as they are collected. Data were analyzed and categorized in open, axial and selective coding stages. To assess the data obtained, the researcher used membercheck, selfcheck, and agreement between two coders. The reliability between two coders was 81.5%. Thus, the results are confirmed in terms of repeatability and reliability between two coders.ResultsThe study results were categorized into 40 subcategories, 12 main categories and three themes under intrainstitutional, transinstitutional and interinstitutional factors.Conclusion According to the results, citizenship education is affected by 12 main factors in the following three general categories: intrainstitutional, transinstitutional and interinstitutional, which were identified as factors and requirements for the development of citizenship education from the perspective of participants. As a complex and specialized matter, and as the ultimate goal of the education system, citizenship education has created a special task for this system whose mission is to develop moral values and behavioral skills.Given the technological, social, political, cultural and economic developments, citizenship teachings should be considered a dynamic phenomenon and compatible with global conditions, and special attention should be paid to the cultural and social reproduction of this element. Considering the need for strategic insight, participation, and networking in the implementation of citizenship education, it is recommended that policymaking institutions prepare citizenship education regulations for schools and a platform for interinstitutional areas. To share the lived experiences of teachers, it is recommended that plans be made for the establishment of knowledge management system and the formation of knowledge nuclei in schools and districts. Improving the quality of school program services requires the use of all citizenshiprelated educational methods, especially, serviceoriented learning methods, dramatic methods and cognitive methods. Given the need to strengthen students’ social skills to form citizenship competencies in the real life, it is recommended that the conditions conducive to reviving past behavioral traditions in favor of the student’s integrated personality, including summer jobs and masterapprentice system be provided in addition to policymaking, planning and feasibility studies. Considering the need for realism and avoiding sloganeering, all those involved in education are recommended to choose and educate a limited number of assessable competencies instead of setting exaggerated goals and implementing superficial plans and programs. In other words, emphasis should be placed on depth instead of extent. Like other studies, the present study had limitations. The proposed categories were from the researcher’s understanding of the participants’ viewpoints. The participants were selected from experts in citizenship education, senior education managers, and principals and teachers. As participants, parents or students can also further enrich the study data. Since purposive sampling was used in the present study, it is recommended that future studies use a larger and more diverse sample size to ensure reliability and generalizability of the results. Furthermore, future studies should use factor analysis or structural equations models to assess factors identified in the present study.