|
|
|
|
we other spartans: orientalism, occidentalism and the enemy “other” ancient greece and contemporary wars
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
نویسنده
|
adib-moghaddam arshin
|
|
منبع
|
مطالعات بين المللي - 2017 - دوره : 13 - شماره : 4 - صفحه:39 -61
|
|
چکیده
|
The article deals with enemy images in east and west and their historical invention. connecting the reader to current controversies about “muslim bans”, the article guides the reader through the nexus of power and knowledge with a particular emphasis on the discourse of orientalism and occidentalism.this type of discourse is retroactive, not only because of its ideological content;, it is in fact and quite directly retroactive. above everything else, the idea that there are essential, unbridgeable differences between cultures and by extension human beings is simply false. this urge to identify us in strict opposition to others has to be resisted, firstly because it is a false polarisation and secondly because it negates the prospect of dialogue and sustainable peace.
|
|
کلیدواژه
|
muslims ,orientalism ,other ,occidentalism ,pluralism.
|
|
آدرس
|
london university, uk
|
|
پست الکترونیکی
|
aa106@soas.ac.uk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We other Spartans: Orientalism, Occidentalism and the enemy “other” Ancient Greece and contemporary wars
|
|
|
|
|
Authors
|
Adib-Moghaddam Arshin
|
|
Abstract
|
The article deals with enemy images in east and west and their historical invention. Connecting the reader to current controversies about “Muslim bans”, the article guides the reader through the nexus of power and knowledge with a particular emphasis on the discourse of Orientalism and Occidentalism.This type of discourse is retroactive, not only because of its ideological content;, it is in fact and quite directly retroactive. Above everything else, the idea that there are essential, unbridgeable differences between cultures and by extension human beings is simply false. This urge to identify us in strict opposition to others has to be resisted, firstly because it is a false polarisation and secondly because it negates the prospect of dialogue and sustainable peace.
|
|
Keywords
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|