The Effects of 10-Week Different Exercise Interventions on Framingham Risk Score and Metabolic Syndrome Severity Scores in Overweight Women With Type 2 Diabetes

Background and aims: type 2 diabetes (t2d) is a strong independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease (cvd). the purpose of this study was to examine the effects of short sprint interval training (sit) and combined aerobic + resistance training (a+r) on framingham risk score (frs) and metabolic syndrome severity scores (mets score) in overweight women with t2d. methods: in this singleblind randomized clinical trial,52 overweight females afflicted with t2d (aged 4560 years, bmi>30 kg/m2, hba1c ≥ 6.5%) were randomly assigned to either sit (n = 17), combined training (n = 17), and control groups (n = 18). interventions consisted of sit or combined aerobicstrength training for 10 weeks. data were analyzed using a paired t test to compare pretest and posttest results in each group. a oneway anova was employed to compare the number of changes in the experimental and control training groups after 10 weeks. results: the results indicated that there were significant differences between the groups in frs (p = 0.001). however, no difference was found in mets score (p = 0.160). in addition, significant differences were observed in frs between sit and combined training groups (p = 0.018) and also sit and control groups (p = 0.001). conclusion: the results highlighted that sit as compared to the combined training could be an effective strategy to improve frs and mets score in women with t2d.

The effects of 10week different exercise interventions on Framingham risk score and metabolic syndrome severity scores in overweight women with type 2 diabetes

Background and aims: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a strong independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of short sprint interval training (SIT) and combined aerobic + resistance training (A+R) on Framingham risk score (FRS) and metabolic syndrome severity scores (MetS score) in overweight women with T2D. Methods: In this singleblind randomized clinical trial,52 overweight females afflicted with T2D (aged 4560 years, BMI>30 kg/m2, HbA1C ≥ 6.5%) were randomly assigned to either SIT (n = 17), combined training (n = 17), and control groups (n = 18). Interventions consisted of SIT or combined aerobicstrength training for 10 weeks. Data were analyzed using a paired t test to compare pretest and posttest results in each group. A oneway ANOVA was employed to compare the number of changes in the experimental and control training groups after 10 weeks. Results: The results indicated that there were significant differences between the groups in FRS (P = 0.001). However, no difference was found in Mets score (P = 0.160). In addition, significant differences were observed in FRS between SIT and combined training groups (P = 0.018) and also SIT and control groups (P = 0.001). Conclusion: The results highlighted that SIT as compared to the combined training could be an effective strategy to improve FRS and Mets score in women with T2D.