|
|
مولفههای ژئوپلیتیکی بر نقض موضع بیطرفی ایران در جنگ جهانی اول ( 1914 - 1918)
|
|
|
|
|
نویسنده
|
لشگری احسان
|
منبع
|
جغرافيا - 1402 - دوره : 21 - شماره : 77 - صفحه:193 -209
|
چکیده
|
با شروع جنگ جهانی اول در اروپا به تدریج دامنه این جنگ به سایر نقاط جهان از جمله آسیا و ایران سرایت نمود و ایران در مقام یک کشور بی طرف به اندازۀ کشورهای درگیر در جنگ و حتی بیشتر از آنها دچار آسیب گردید. این در حالی بود که علی رغم اعلام بیطرفی ایران در جنگ جهانی اول دول متخاصم چندان به این موضع سیاسی ایران توجه ننمودند. تاکنون مطالعات متعدد سیاسی تاریخی در مورد علل عدم رعایت موضع بی طرفی ایران در جنگ جهانی اول صورت گرفته است. لیکن در این مطالعات کمتر به مقتضیات ژئوپلیتیک نادیده گرفتن بیطرفی ایران توسط دول متخاصم و دسته بندی موضوعی آن ذیل مفهوم ژئوپلیتیک پرداخته شده است. مضمون اصلی مطالعات ژئوپلیتیک کلاسیک مشتمل بر مطالعۀ تاثیر جغرافیا در ابعاد طبیعی و انسانی در رفتار سیاسی کشورها در روابط بین الملل بوده است. در این پژوهش کوشش گردیده با اتکا به روش توصیفی تحلیلی علل ناکارآمدی سیاست بی طرفی ایران در چارچوب موضوعات ژئوانرژی، ژئوکالچر و مقتضیات مربوط به جایگاه ژئواستراتژیک مورد بررسی قرار گیرد. یافته های تحقیق بیانگر آن است که مولفه قرارگیری ایران در کنار برخی از دولت های حاضر در جنگ به مثابه یک عامل ژئواستراتژیک و وجود ذخایر نفتی در جنوب غرب ایران به مثابه یک عامل ژئوانرژی از جمله مهمترین مولفههای سرایت جنگ جهانی اول به کشور ایران بود. همچنین استفاده ابزاری قدرتهای حاضر در جنگ از اعتقادات اسلامی و مولفههای ملیگرایی مردم ایران به مثابه یک سیاست ژئوکالچری؛ سبب گردید دامنه این جنگ به درون قلمرو ایران نیز سرایت نماید.
|
کلیدواژه
|
جنگ جهانی اول، ژئوپلیتیک، بیطرفی، ایران
|
آدرس
|
دانشگاه یزد, ایران
|
پست الکترونیکی
|
lashgari@yazd.ac.ir
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
conformation of geopolitical components effective on the violation of iran’s neutral position in the world war(i) (1914 1918)
|
|
|
Authors
|
lashgari tafreshi ehsan
|
Abstract
|
extended abstractintroductiondikes are internal igneous structures that have penetrated their host rocks in the form of sheets. these structures are mostly caused by the ascent of magma in fractures caused by regional tensile stresses or volcanic rifts. dikes are classified based on different criteria such as origin and formation method. some of them are known as sheeted dikes in ophiolitic complexes. these dikes are formed in ophiolitic complexes and in the place of magma ascent channel forming pillow lavas. some dikes in volcanic areas play a role as dikes feeding volcanic zones or dacite and rhyolitic domes. this type of dikes is called feeder dikes. another group of them penetrated in a relatively wide area inside the fractures that were formed under the influence of a specific tectonic regime and massively in one area, which are called swarm dikes, which are the subject of this discussion. it is an article. in swarm dikes, usually their frequency distribution in the region is more than 2 dikes per square kilometer. the formation of swarm dikes is due to the action of the tensile tectonic regime in the earth’s crust, before their replacement. in this case, the abundance of dikes is directly related to the maximum amount of tensile stress. due to the existence of different ophiolitic and volcanic regions in iran, as well as the occurrence of different orogenic phases and the application of different tectonic regimes in different geological periods in the land of iran, different volcanic dikes were formed in its structural land areas. of course, no comparative research has been done to compare these geomorphological complications. therefore, in this article, the researcher seeks to introduce more swarm dikes, compare and examine their general characteristics and their formation mechanism, with references from the dikes in the north of saveh, in the urmia dakhtar zone, and the dykes of delbar and zarigan regions in central iran. methodologyin this research, firstly, information was collected about the nature and mechanism of swarm dikes, and then a relatively large number of searches were conducted in written sources, especially researches and theses, about swarm dikes in iran. the statistical population of this research is all the swarm dikes of iran, which were chosen from among the types of these dikes due to the abundance of dikes in two geo structural zones, urmia dakhtar and central iran. and finally, a comparative study related to the general characteristics, time of formation and comparison of the formation mechanism and geodynamic model of these dikes with the formation mechanism and geodynamic model of other typical swarm dikes of the world has been done. result and discussionfrom the geodynamic point of view, the swarm dikes in the north of saveh follow a relatively regular and parallel linear arrangement, which is generally in the same direction as the general trend of the faults in the region and has a general trend of northwest, west southeast, east. according to the studies of ernst et al. (1999), the swarm dikes in north saveh, which is a part of the urmia dakhter structural zone dikes, can be considered swarm type iv dikes. which are caused by the creation of regional stress areas. according to huo’s (2012) studies, swarm dikes in delbar area can be considered similar to parallel dikes, which they call parallel fuji dykes with a linear pattern in a range they have been formed with a relatively limited extent and under the influence of regional stresses resulting from the primary back arc caftic tension caused by the subduction of the neotethys oceanic lithosphere under the continental lithosphere of central iran. from the geodynamic point of view, swarm zarigan dikes follow an irregular linear arrangement. shows that there is no significant relationship between the trend of faults in the studied area and the direction of their establishment (northwest, west southeast, east). according to the studies of ernst et al. (1999), these swarm dikes, which are part of the swarm dikes of the structural zone of central iran, are similar to v type swarm dikes. which are caused by the creation of regional tension areas.conclusionthere are many geomorphological phenomena known as mass dikes in different geological zones of iran. which are different from each other in terms of age of formation, formation mechanism and type of constituent rocks. comparative studies of swarm dikes in two structural zones of urmia dokhtar and central iran show that their age ranges from cambrian to oligomiocene and their lithological composition varies from basic to acidic rocks. and in the three studied areas, it mainly includes andesite, basaltic, gabbro, gabbro diorite and alkali gabbro rocks. geological stresses affecting their formation have been different in different regions. according to ernst’s classification, swarm dikes in north saveh are classified as type iv dikes and swarm dikes in delbar and zarigan area are classified as type v dikes. and according to hou’s classification, the dikes of all three regions follow a linear pattern. the mechanism of formation of dikes in all three regions is related to subduction and ascent of magma in fractures caused by subduction.
|
Keywords
|
world war(i) ,g eopolitics ,neutrality ,iran
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|