|
|
تحلیلی بر گزارش تاثیرگذارترین مغزهای علمی جهان منتشر شده از موسسه تامسون رویترز در سال 2015 و مقایسه آن با گزارش سال 2014
|
|
|
|
|
نویسنده
|
سیدی سیدمهدی
|
منبع
|
پژوهش در پزشكي - 1395 - دوره : 40 - شماره : 3 - صفحه:94 -95
|
|
|
|
|
آدرس
|
فرهنگستان علوم پزشکی, گروه پژوهش و آیندهنگاری, ایران
|
پست الکترونیکی
|
seyedi@nigeb.ac.ir
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Analysis of the scientific minds of the world's most influential report released by Thomson Reuters in 2015 compared with 2014 report
|
|
|
Authors
|
seyedi seyedmehdi
|
Abstract
|
The quantity and quality of scientific outputs from two points of view considered that anyIn its place is important. One of the outcomes of each country ArticlesPublished in various scientific topics in prestigious journalsInternational organizations and from the perspective of a small, representing the scientific activitiesEach country and qualitatively reflect the scientific strengths and is a leader. For easeCategories disciplines that are more than three thousand matures, the field dueThe thematic similarities in the areas of macroplaced to compare betweenSeminaries, universities, countries and people is possible. The division in mostThe world has many similarities with each other. For example, in RepublicIran's Islamic various disciplines of science is in seven major areasThey are: Humanities, value and knowledge of basic sciences, medical sciences,Engineering sciences, agricultural sciences and interdisciplinary sciences. The value SciencesKnowledge and seminaries, Medical Sciences and Ministry of Health and EducationMedical, and five other metropolitan areas the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology Dealershe does. The task of policymaking and planning for each area respectively withSeminaries, Ministry of Health, Treatment and Medical Education, Ministry of Science,Research and Technology.
|
Keywords
|
Scientific outputs ,frequently cited articles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|